| Author | Topic |
|---|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Berowra-Sydney
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Turbo or Supercharge?
|
Tue, 14 October 2003 09:14
|
 |
Well that is the question, whats the pro's and con's of both.
Which costs more,
Which requires less engine work?
and what is a safe boost pressure before you would need to install stronger pistons, crank ect.
Personally i think Supercharger would be easier, cheaper and not so hard on the engine.
What are your thoughts?
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Turbo or Supercharge?
|
GIN51E | Tue, 14 October 2003 09:14 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
Classique71 | Tue, 14 October 2003 09:28 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
lang | Tue, 14 October 2003 09:32 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
Classique71 | Tue, 14 October 2003 09:46 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
GIN51E | Tue, 14 October 2003 10:32 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
Classique71 | Tue, 14 October 2003 10:41 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 14 October 2003 10:39 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
GIN51E | Tue, 14 October 2003 11:10 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
Henn | Tue, 14 October 2003 15:25 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
Nark | Wed, 15 October 2003 01:57 |
|
Re: Turbo or Supercharge?
|
$450 ta22 | Wed, 15 October 2003 13:10 |
