| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Fri, 17 September 2004 00:40
|
 |
 he beat me!!!!
now im never going to hear then end of it, my car REALLY needs a dyno tune!!
|
|
|
Location:
Adelaide, SA
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Fri, 17 September 2004 05:05
|
|
You need to redeem yourself now 
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Fri, 17 September 2004 10:46
|
|
I was thinking "why bother?"
But man, sucks to be you right then. 
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Fri, 17 September 2004 13:20
|
|
yeah its running pretty slow i wasnt expecting a big win but i coulda got a lot closer!!
ahh well, in a month it'll get its dyno tune!
|
|
|
Location:
ghetto area 2745
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Fri, 17 September 2004 23:04
|
|
mate dont be sad
pajeros in manual are very torquey and the short wheel base 1 i had held an xr6 manual to 120 side by side 
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Sat, 18 September 2004 12:00
|
|
| jessetamsett wrote on Sat, 18 September 2004 18:16 |
long wheel base automatic one...
but was the 24v 35000 engine
i think its about time for round 2, played with the cams this weekend and its going a lot better now!
|
350 Litre!
No wonder you lost
|
|
|
Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Sun, 19 September 2004 00:04
|
|
| Apollo wrote on Sat, 18 September 2004 22:00 |
| jessetamsett wrote on Sat, 18 September 2004 18:16 |
long wheel base automatic one...
but was the 24v 35000 engine
i think its about time for round 2, played with the cams this weekend and its going a lot better now!
|
350 Litre!
No wonder you lost
|
fucken oath I'm goinbg to buy one of them!!!!!!
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Sun, 19 September 2004 08:33
|
|
hahaha woooops...
yeah i hear its pretty bad on the petty though aye
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 08:43
|
|
its actually 35 litres so we're both idiots
the t-18 kept up with a st185 today, so theres a slightly better example
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 10:29
|
|
| jessetamsett wrote on Mon, 20 September 2004 18:43 |
its actually 35 litres so we're both idiots
the t-18 kept up with a st185 today, so theres a slightly better example
|
Oh yea, so it is. 
Anyway, if it kept up with the gt4, then how did you loose to a pajero?
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 11:29
|
|
owww is st185 a gt4 :S???
i kept up with the fwd celica that looks the same as a gt4.
played with the cams a bit since my embraissing defeat from the pajero, goes much better now
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Mon, 20 September 2004 12:35
|
|
| jessetamsett wrote on Mon, 20 September 2004 21:29 |
owww is st185 a gt4 :S???
i kept up with the fwd celica that looks the same as a gt4.
played with the cams a bit since my embraissing defeat from the pajero, goes much better now
|
Oh ok, so you basically kept up with a camry. ST184 5sfe 2.2l.
|
|
|
Location:
Castle Hill, Sydney
Registered:
February 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 00:29
|
|
|
ok...so i take it my car's meant to spank one of them too!!?
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 05:36
|
|
| jessetamsett wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 10:29 |
ok...so i take it my car's meant to spank one of them too!!?
|
Mmmmm.... maybe I was a little confusing there.
I mean that the celica was most likely a ST184 which has a 5sfe engine of 2.2l capacity since you mentioned it was a FWD.
Same 4 cylinder engine as the camry (widebody), of the same era.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Tue, 21 September 2004 13:39
|
|
|
Little off the topic but was wondering does the Celica 5SFE have a different engine management? Just my dad celica recommends premium fuel and my friends Camry recommends just unleaded fuel?
|
|
|
Location:
toowoomba qld
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: 3tg T-18 VS 91' pajero
|
Sat, 25 September 2004 11:51
|
|
| Celica73 wrote on Tue, 21 September 2004 23:39 |
Little off the topic but was wondering does the Celica 5SFE have a different engine management? Just my dad celica recommends premium fuel and my friends Camry recommends just unleaded fuel?
|
As far as I know they use the same engine management system. The premium fuel is suppose to have an higher octane rating then normal unleaded, so therefore giving you a slightly better fuel economy and a slight increase in performance.
|
|
|
