| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
have U noticed
|
granmra40 | Fri, 07 January 2005 00:08 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
Soarer | Fri, 07 January 2005 00:34 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 07 January 2005 01:12 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
KOFFEE-BLACK | Fri, 07 January 2005 01:01 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
wazzabp | Fri, 07 January 2005 01:25 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
finney | Fri, 07 January 2005 01:43 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
Toobs | Fri, 07 January 2005 03:04 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
DiZ_ | Fri, 07 January 2005 06:41 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
rthy | Sat, 08 January 2005 00:16 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
Camry_omega | Sat, 08 January 2005 00:32 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
finney | Sat, 08 January 2005 01:10 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
rthy | Sat, 08 January 2005 01:48 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
WiLo | Sun, 09 January 2005 02:07 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
Alchemist | Sat, 08 January 2005 03:50 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
Aust162 | Sat, 08 January 2005 07:26 |
|
Re: have U noticed
|
CS-X | Sun, 09 January 2005 03:36 |
have U noticed
Fri, 07 January 2005 00:08
) of late model cars without all brake lights working. Some I know are up up in the $40K bracket. I find this hard to understand as I have had many cars, nothing later than '79, and never had to replace a bulb. Have I been lucky? Is everything today designed to crumble and break? And why should I have a rego check every year? I make sure that everything works, I would not have it any other way 
.
