| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 06:47
|
 |
|
OK i just saw on the news/today tonight or some bullshit add that there trying to/going to make showing your underware in public "illegal" even showin over the top of your jeans...i think...its like a 50 dollar on the spot fine, what are all the skaties who ware there pants around there ankles? There screwed.
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Toymods Club Secretary
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 06:53
|
|
bah thats stupid.... i bet its all the oldies who have thier pants up near thier armpits that started it all 
its not as though its indecent exposure, over time pants slip down if they aren't a perfect fit, its a fact of life.....
|
|
|
Toymods Social Secretary
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 06:54
|
|
and the old "its too hot, im just going to wear my bra"!!! 
NOOOOOO!!!!
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 06:55
|
|
|
assuming ur at the beach u get fined for showing ur underwear but its perfectly fine to walk around in a bikini thats too small??
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Australia
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:05
|
|
|
|
|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
February 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:12
|
|
| unforgiven wrote on Wed, 09 February 2005 16:47 |
OK i just saw on the news/today tonight or some bullshit add that there trying to/going to make showing your underware in public "illegal" <snip rest>
|
err ... are you really considering anything broadcast on the Ray Martin Show (or TT as it tries to be known as) as being remotely connected with the truth or somehow factual?
i think some hick US town tried to introduce this ... and now Fred Nile's merry band of neochristian ultra-fascists are selling the same line to the media here ... and TT's rigorous and thorough research department have turned a born-again wet dream into something vaguely resembling infotainment...
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
December 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:24
|
|
in protest i'm gonna wear my y-fronts outside my pants! 
|
|
|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:34
|
|
| CrUZsida wrote on Wed, 09 February 2005 15:05 |
|
i agree 
just wear no underwear 
|
|
|
Location:
Campbelltown, NSW
Registered:
November 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:37
|
|
yeah apparently its illigal in virginia or some bullshit
we should have a ANIT-UNDERWEAR law cruise..
every1 has to bring a hot chick in her undies
CHEERS
NOLAN
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
December 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:42
|
|
well in kentucky the legal age on consent is 14! 
|
|
|
On Probation
Location:
sydney
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 07:45
|
|
great.......... and i just bought some cK undies for $39.95 
|
|
|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
April 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 08:14
|
|
Its the goverment trying to win votes from the older fellas out there by punishing the unruly youth of this nation.
BOV illegal - now this.
Looks like this is starting to become a tyranny.
I think its high time for the mofos to get the @#$k out of power.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 10:17
|
|
If it was on TT it's not happening 
|
|
|
Location:
Australia
Registered:
May 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 10:22
|
|
|
biggest load of crap i've heard in a while!
|
|
|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 10:27
|
|
|
It's only in Virgina in the States, it's got nothing to do with Australia.
|
|
|
Location:
Batemans Bay, NSW
Registered:
February 2005
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 13:51
|
|
I fell asleep when I saw this..........phfftttt.....please...$100 fine for exposed boxers....whats the sad world coming to....load of shit...not that it affects us, though still ludacris......
everytime I see my grandma shes like ur pants are fallin down....."yeh n Im gona tripp over them any minute now....z'z'z'z
back to bed I go.........
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne - NthSubs
Registered:
January 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 14:48
|
|
yea why ware boxers or wat ever when u can use nothing at all!
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 16:19
|
|
|
running shorts should be banned in that case coz it seems more revealing than boxers
|
|
|
Location:
Land of Oz
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Wed, 09 February 2005 21:00
|
|
Hi,
| sated wrote on Wed, 09 February 2005 19:14 |
Its the goverment trying to win votes from the older fellas out there by punishing the unruly youth of this nation.
|
Well, I can assure you that this "old fella" won't be supporting any government that wants to implement this draconian law.
Now we can have multiple law suits where people can sue 'cos they caught a glimpse of someones undies and they're now scarred for life due to this massive trauma.
I think we need to go further with this and implement the "Troll" law. Basically, the Troll law states that if someone is fugly enough, and you deem their head to be offensive and upsetting to your visual senses, then you can sue them for the grief, shock and trauma their wickedly ugly head has caused you.
Then we can push for the "Body Odour" law, where their smell is offensive to you.
Then there's "Shit Apparel" law, where poor and badly chosen clothing items can offend.
I'm sure there's more useless laws I can come up with, and when I gather enough pointless data and ideas I'll give "Dickhead Ray" a call and see if he can put it onto his equally pointless TV show.
Matter of fact, just got another brainstorm. The "Ray Martin" law where stupid, dumb-ass, crap TV shows are offensive and gaulling in their inappropriate stories and wastage of bandwidth and my time with their dribble.
seeyuzz
river
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Potts Point, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Thu, 10 February 2005 14:39
|
|
|
BOVs are illegal?
|
|
|
Location:
Oakleigh, Melbourne
Registered:
March 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Thu, 10 February 2005 15:03
|
|
| rthy wrote on Thu, 10 February 2005 01:48 |
yea why ware boxers or wat ever when u can use nothing at all!
|
God Bless you Dean
Bah! 'crack' has always been illegal, but people still do it anyway! VIVA LE FREEDOM!
Must be a new soccer mum in parliament who suggests any trends of society should be illegal and protecting the environment and national securities come second place. Lame.
Though i must admit: The rule shuld be imposed for any plumbers and bakers at the factory where i work. I swear i'll never eat <insert brand name bread here> again.
-Jay
|
|
|
Location:
Land of Oz
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Thu, 10 February 2005 20:43
|
|
Hi,
| thu187 wrote on Fri, 11 February 2005 01:39 |
BOVs are illegal?
|
Especially if you stick one up your exposed crack for the world to see!
seeyuzz
river
|
|
|
Location:
Potts Point, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
|
Location:
Melbourne
Registered:
November 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Fri, 11 February 2005 01:38
|
|
I think some of the idiots that wear their pants around their ankles look stupid... but offensive?
I can sorta imagine why they might find it offensive, but I find combovers and fat aging men wearing ill fitting cloths offensive in the same way. So perhaps we should pass a bill banning those? Or perhaps a "not passing stupid laws" would be a better one. I'm glad this didn't get through... and that U.S. isn't THAT stupid.
|
|
|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
September 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Sun, 13 February 2005 21:50
|
|
|
Isn't Virginia the state where the age of consent is 14?
|
|
|
Toymods Social Secretary
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
July 2002
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Mon, 14 February 2005 09:28
|
|
i just dont want everyday images like this to be outlawed....
|
|
|
Registered:
December 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Mon, 14 February 2005 09:52
|
|
oh my fucking god
that is a HOT ass..
fuck me...
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Mon, 14 February 2005 09:55
|
|
| muzzi wrote on Mon, 14 February 2005 20:52 |
oh my fucking god
that is a HOT ass..
fuck me...
|
hope the face is just as good. i hate it when girls look hot and the minute they turn around u go OMFG!!! nice frm far, far from nice
|
|
|
Registered:
December 2004
|
|
|
I Supported Toymods
Location:
south Melbourne/KL
Registered:
June 2004
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Mon, 14 February 2005 10:50
|
|
the dilemma starts when they r intelligent with a hot body and a not so good face 
|
|
|
Location:
Potts Point, Sydney
Registered:
October 2003
|
|
Re: Underware showing illegal?
|
Mon, 14 February 2005 12:15
|
|
| muzzi wrote on Mon, 14 February 2005 20:59 |
I didn't say anything about the rest of her but I will say it again - my fucking god that is a HOT ASS..
|
you're thinking straight...well done
|
|
|
Registered:
December 2004
|
|
|
