Author | Topic |
Registered: March 2005
|
RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Mon, 28 March 2005 02:57
|
 |
thinking of making an ra60 or ra65 into a drifter, has anyone here actually done this already or know of it being done? I was inspired the other day when my mate got me to drive his ra60 home and i was amazed at it's ability to go sidways but stay undercontrol (most of the time ) it was stock too btw ie. massive body roll 
Im imagining that with a decsent suspension set up and wheels + a supra lsd it would go well, (not to mention an engine swap, but not sure what? thinking sr20 as most toyota 4s are fwd and require work to convert.
The only thing which troubles me is the lack of people who have ever drifted an ra60??? there is most likely a good reason why but im not sure what it is yet...
what does everyone think? im liking the idea of turning up to a drift day in a car nobody has!
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
monkeyPunch | Mon, 28 March 2005 02:57 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Les | Mon, 28 March 2005 03:32 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Evan | Mon, 28 March 2005 03:34 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
draven | Mon, 28 March 2005 03:40 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
monkeyPunch | Mon, 28 March 2005 03:46 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Evan | Mon, 28 March 2005 03:49 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
monkeyPunch | Mon, 28 March 2005 03:50 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Nark | Mon, 28 March 2005 04:33 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
monkeyPunch | Mon, 28 March 2005 04:46 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Nark | Mon, 28 March 2005 07:06 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
coFF33 | Mon, 28 March 2005 07:27 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Nark | Mon, 28 March 2005 08:04 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
brett_celicacoupe | Mon, 28 March 2005 08:12 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Hirogen | Mon, 28 March 2005 07:52 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
monkeyPunch | Mon, 28 March 2005 08:05 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Nark | Mon, 28 March 2005 09:11 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Nark | Mon, 28 March 2005 09:13 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
brett_celicacoupe | Mon, 28 March 2005 09:23 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Nark | Mon, 28 March 2005 10:01 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
monkeyPunch | Mon, 28 March 2005 10:17 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
brett_celicacoupe | Mon, 28 March 2005 10:34 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
unforgiven | Mon, 28 March 2005 08:39 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
h3ff44 | Mon, 28 March 2005 09:56 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
RWDboy | Mon, 28 March 2005 13:40 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Norbie | Mon, 28 March 2005 14:05 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Mookie | Mon, 28 March 2005 22:50 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
RWDboy | Tue, 29 March 2005 00:54 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
RWDboy | Tue, 29 March 2005 00:56 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Mookie | Tue, 29 March 2005 01:21 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Norbie | Tue, 29 March 2005 01:36 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Mookie | Tue, 29 March 2005 01:37 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
RWDboy | Tue, 29 March 2005 03:10 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Indi | Tue, 29 March 2005 03:32 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Mookie | Tue, 29 March 2005 03:51 |
 |
Re: RA60/65 celica, to drift or not to drift?
|
Henn | Tue, 29 March 2005 10:06 |
Current Time:
Wed Jul 23 18:58:01 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0052621364593506 seconds |