| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Perth
Registered:
May 2004
|
|
SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Fri, 24 June 2005 06:50
|
 |
I have been searching the internet / forums (working hard today!)
Trying to find out,
Given An identical engine and all other params (boost, fuelling, temps etc..) being equal
Would a Supercharged or Turbo Charged version produce the lowest emissions?
Cheers,
Adam
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
acreese | Fri, 24 June 2005 06:50 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Henn | Fri, 24 June 2005 06:57 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
rob_RA40 | Fri, 24 June 2005 07:00 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
acreese | Fri, 24 June 2005 07:24 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
mrshin | Sat, 25 June 2005 06:06 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
shinybluesteel | Sat, 25 June 2005 06:11 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
4agte | Sat, 25 June 2005 07:02 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
bored | Sun, 26 June 2005 05:50 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
4agte | Sun, 26 June 2005 07:16 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
acreese | Mon, 27 June 2005 01:26 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
inertia | Sun, 26 June 2005 06:20 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Allan | Mon, 27 June 2005 02:05 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Joshstix | Mon, 27 June 2005 02:23 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Allan | Mon, 27 June 2005 02:30 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Joshstix | Mon, 27 June 2005 02:50 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Allan | Mon, 27 June 2005 02:52 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
Joshstix | Mon, 27 June 2005 03:15 |
|
Re: SC vs Turbo -- Emissions
|
inertia | Mon, 27 June 2005 08:31 |
