Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Sun, 23 June 2002 09:42
|
|
inertia wrote on Sun, 23 June 2002 4:17 PM | I've been looking closely at the ti4200, the overclocking ability is very nice indeed, but I don't usually overclock much. The price difference between a ti4200 & ti4400 is not much. The ti4600 is not worth it. Considering a ti4400 can be overclocked to the same levels. I'd like to know how far a ti4600 could be clocked!
I believe the Leadtek one is the way to go, due to its very nice wrap-around heatsink. Cool to the touch even during intense games at the shop.
It's all good, I buy knowing that mine may not be the best but it is still damned good and it is still running all the games I play flawlessly at nice resolutions . When the games have to have their graphics details altered from full etc. That's the time for me to look around and gauge whether what's available at the time is good for another 6 months. I believe the Geforce4 Ti is good for another 6 months, given the games I like to play...
As I said, buy what you need, because you need/want it. Don't go for "top dog" if you don't need it, you'll be bitterly disappointed in just a few months when new products leave yours in their dust heheh.
|
Leadtek. My personal opinion of them with also seeing the problems other people have is to steer clear of them.
BTW, a 64meg leadtek ti4200 is $399 anyway. May as well spend the extra $40 to get something that is better quality, (hand picked cores), twice the memory, and that can do VIVO instead of only tv out. The 128meg one is over $500. And I'm getting prices from pretty much the cheapest place in the country at gamedude.
There you have it. I hope this gives you a better understanding to make your choice from.
EDIT: I better mention sorry for the hijacked thread.
[Updated on: Sun, 23 June 2002 09:43]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
computer/parts
|
maxdamage75 | Sun, 16 June 2002 14:10 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
CrAiGzEE | Sun, 16 June 2002 14:29 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
CrAiGzEE | Sun, 16 June 2002 14:30 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
maxdamage75 | Sun, 16 June 2002 14:35 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
St3ve_AE92 | Sun, 16 June 2002 14:56 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
maxdamage75 | Wed, 19 June 2002 14:33 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Apollo | Sun, 16 June 2002 22:09 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
RA28 | Sun, 16 June 2002 22:31 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Stefan | Wed, 19 June 2002 14:20 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Mentor | Wed, 19 June 2002 14:37 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
maxdamage75 | Mon, 17 June 2002 01:53 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
St3ve_AE92 | Mon, 17 June 2002 02:53 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Apollo | Mon, 17 June 2002 03:42 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Rattlehead | Tue, 18 June 2002 05:50 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Rattlehead | Wed, 19 June 2002 15:21 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
maxdamage75 | Sun, 23 June 2002 07:25 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
CrAiGzEE | Thu, 20 June 2002 03:07 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
inertia | Fri, 21 June 2002 15:43 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Rattlehead | Sat, 22 June 2002 02:08 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Stefan | Sat, 22 June 2002 03:14 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Rattlehead | Sat, 22 June 2002 08:13 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
inertia | Sat, 22 June 2002 11:56 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Apollo | Sat, 22 June 2002 23:53 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
St3ve_AE92 | Sat, 22 June 2002 22:31 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
St3ve_AE92 | Sun, 23 June 2002 01:55 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
inertia | Sun, 23 June 2002 06:17 |
|
Re: computer/parts
|
Apollo | Sun, 23 June 2002 09:42 |
Current Time:
Sat Feb 1 12:59:02 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0057828426361084 seconds |