Author | Topic |

Location: Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered: January 2003
|
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
Wed, 18 June 2003 05:38

|
 |
fingers wrote on Wed, 18 June 2003 09:14 | I would have thought that having six cylinders compared to four for a given size would make it smoother as you have two extra pistons firing.
Is that a valid comment?
|
definitely, and is what everyone is forgetting.
the power output of a motor is not constant, but is a pulsing curve with one pulse for each piston firing.
take an extreme example.
a 3L 4 cyl, compared to a 3L V10
the 4cyl will have two power pulses per revolution, and the V10 will have 5 pulses. so the V10 will have much smoother power delivery, and i think that the average torque (area under the curve of torque vs time) will be higher for the V10.
an analogy is single phase vs 3 phase electricity. liek comparing single cylinder vs 3 cylinder. (unfortunately it's like comparing different size engines tho)
if you look at a graph of the three suprimposed voltage curves for 3 phase, the average voltage is higher.. 415V vs 240V, and you have 3 times the amperage available...
i'm sure an elec engineer will be able to do the math as i'm a bit rusty, but i think that for a 3 phase circuit with same amperage going thru it, it will have higher power than a single phase with same amperage.
yes the mechanical losses will be higher, but not by much..
a direct example from the bike world for 1L motors(assuming similar development) a YZF-R1 (4cyl) has about 105Nm, where a VTR-SP1 has about 100Nm, so 5% less for same capacity. they have vry diferent torque curves too, with the R1 having torque higher in the rev range, and the SP1 having a wider and flatter, but lower rpm, torque curve.....
Cya, Stewart
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Capacity vs Cylinders
|
justcallmefrank | Sun, 15 June 2003 10:24 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
lang | Sun, 15 June 2003 10:29 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
justcallmefrank | Sun, 15 June 2003 10:30 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 15 June 2003 10:35 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
manipulate | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:10 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:26 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
BansheeBuzz | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:35 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:43 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
mrshin | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:29 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
mrshin | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:45 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
justcallmefrank | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:48 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:52 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
justcallmefrank | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:54 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 15 June 2003 11:55 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
fingers | Tue, 17 June 2003 23:14 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
Nark | Wed, 18 June 2003 04:07 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 18 June 2003 05:38 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
thetoyman75 | Wed, 18 June 2003 04:33 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
gianttomato | Wed, 18 June 2003 04:36 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 18 June 2003 04:37 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
Purple_Beasty | Wed, 18 June 2003 05:09 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 18 June 2003 05:16 |
 |
Re: Capacity vs Cylinders
|
1ndecent | Wed, 18 June 2003 05:51 |
Current Time:
Mon Jul 21 05:58:20 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.012553930282593 seconds |