| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney, OZ
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Sat, 21 June 2003 08:25
 
|
 |
|
The Hilux/4Runners that were release here and US (89-96) had a 2 valve twin cam 3VZ-E, Not the quad 4 valved 3VZ-FE's. The Camry came the 3VZ-FE, but the problem with fitting them into RWD applications is the dizzy location. But the newer 5VZ-FE (3.4L Pardo/new V6 Hilux) is far better as they run a multi coil setup, (no dizzy) eat half the fuel and produce a heap more grunt. All you need is the 4Runner/Hilux bellhousing and engine mounts and go form there.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
ehendrikd | Fri, 20 June 2003 04:41 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
biased99 | Fri, 20 June 2003 06:02 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Soarer | Fri, 20 June 2003 09:02 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
BansheeBuzz | Fri, 20 June 2003 20:54 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Johnny | Sat, 21 June 2003 08:25 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
ehendrikd | Sun, 22 June 2003 23:22 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 23 June 2003 01:37 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
gianttomato | Mon, 23 June 2003 01:47 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 23 June 2003 01:55 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Jayem | Mon, 23 June 2003 22:54 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Norbie | Mon, 23 June 2003 23:40 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Jayem | Mon, 23 June 2003 23:50 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
Norbie | Mon, 23 June 2003 23:59 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
gianttomato | Tue, 24 June 2003 01:47 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
CamZH | Mon, 04 August 2003 21:41 |
|
Re: 3VZ-FE <- RWD?
|
cambelt | Tue, 05 August 2003 00:45 |
