| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
NSW Engadine
Registered:
June 2003
|
 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Wed, 16 July 2003 21:37
|
 |
My 79 4K is in a critical condition and I have to perform a heart transplant asap.
I went out and bought a reconditioned 82 4K w/4spd for $200 should i have gone for the high-cam? are the high-cams more powerful?
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
79rollaboy | Wed, 16 July 2003 21:37 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
pro_ke | Thu, 17 July 2003 02:27 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
79rollaboy | Thu, 17 July 2003 21:57 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 17 July 2003 04:39 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Grega | Fri, 18 July 2003 08:13 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Seadog | Sat, 19 July 2003 01:54 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
EMP-2TG | Sat, 19 July 2003 02:00 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
draven | Sat, 19 July 2003 04:11 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 19 July 2003 07:14 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Seadog | Wed, 23 July 2003 05:13 |
