| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Thu, 17 July 2003 04:39
 
|
 |
yup. 'hi-cam' was toyotas response to the overhead cams of the day like in the dattos etc. it's meant to mean that the cam is high in the block... and it is half way up  but they are exactly the same engines...
i once had a guy who worked at toyota for 20 years try to tell me that the hi-cam was a different type of motor and made more power... but he was also trying to sell his 'daughters' car.
chuck the motor in.. all good.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
79rollaboy | Wed, 16 July 2003 21:37 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
pro_ke | Thu, 17 July 2003 02:27 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
79rollaboy | Thu, 17 July 2003 21:57 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 17 July 2003 04:39 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Grega | Fri, 18 July 2003 08:13 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Seadog | Sat, 19 July 2003 01:54 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
EMP-2TG | Sat, 19 July 2003 02:00 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
draven | Sat, 19 July 2003 04:11 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 19 July 2003 07:14 |
|
Re: 4K-C Vs 4K-C High-cam
|
Seadog | Wed, 23 July 2003 05:13 |
