| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Montrose, VIC
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Sat, 19 July 2003 08:44
|
 |
|
It sure is an interesting idea - sometime I do plan on getting some parts done, and seeing if I can compare them in any way to untreated parts, looking for an improvement. Sure, it's blown out of proportion, but there probably is SOME improvement available - and it is relatively cheap.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 17 July 2003 18:41 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Jayem | Thu, 17 July 2003 20:06 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
manipulate | Sat, 19 July 2003 08:49 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Jayem | Sat, 19 July 2003 14:41 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Allan | Sun, 20 July 2003 00:48 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
twinturbo86 | Thu, 17 July 2003 22:23 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Jayem | Fri, 18 July 2003 09:04 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
thechuckster | Sat, 19 July 2003 01:23 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 19 July 2003 07:24 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
mrshin | Sat, 19 July 2003 08:44 |
