| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Sat, 19 July 2003 08:49
 
|
 |
| Jayem wrote on Fri, 18 July 2003 06:06 |
I dont think that car factories use that treatment (prove me wrong) and wouldnt they use it if that really would make for example "both brake pads and brake rotors achieve 2-3 times the life out of both items, whilst giving 'better feel' at the same time. even 'increased efficiency' from alternators!".
|
That would mean your customers of your particular make of car need to replace their parts less often....which = >$$$.....thats their motivation for NOT using it
Ta
Mani
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 17 July 2003 18:41 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Jayem | Thu, 17 July 2003 20:06 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
manipulate | Sat, 19 July 2003 08:49 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Jayem | Sat, 19 July 2003 14:41 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Allan | Sun, 20 July 2003 00:48 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
twinturbo86 | Thu, 17 July 2003 22:23 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
Jayem | Fri, 18 July 2003 09:04 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
thechuckster | Sat, 19 July 2003 01:23 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
oldcorollas | Sat, 19 July 2003 07:24 |
|
Re: anyone ever had "cryogenic" treated parts??
|
mrshin | Sat, 19 July 2003 08:44 |
