F.A.Q.    Register    Login    Home Members    Search

Toymods » Tech & Conversions » high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls  Email to friend

Author	Topic
clubagreenie Forums Junkie Location: 1st street on the right Registered: November 2002	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG Mon, 18 August 2003 11:01 Stud the head, it should also be better for the head in some way that I read once be temporarily escapes me. Also from memory Ridgecrest don't make a copper gasket for 18rg (if this is wrong or someone else does let me know). 11/12:1 is high for 98Ron, where were you getting pistons like this as I'm also trying to source some (though only around 9.5:1) JP's in Adelaide haven't made 18rg pistons previously and require specs which I'm also trying to get (anyone, anyone). A metgal gasket would let you "play" with comp ratios if the pistons you want aren't available. The rods should be studded, studding the crank isn't a bad idea for higher revs. Bore stroke for 18rg is 88.5 x 80 (though another source says 89x80, confirmation) and so is over square, good for revving. Good cams, the right head (88253 has larger valves) balanced and well built shoud be strong enough and have adequate power for N/a motor. [Report message to a moderator]

	Subject	Poster	Date
	high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Mr DOHC	Mon, 18 August 2003 07:05
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	oldcorollas	Mon, 18 August 2003 08:44
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	clubagreenie	Mon, 18 August 2003 11:01
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	clubagreenie	Mon, 18 August 2003 11:03
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	earlyrolla	Mon, 18 August 2003 16:33
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Mr DOHC	Tue, 19 August 2003 00:58
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Steve M	Tue, 19 August 2003 05:08
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Steve M	Tue, 19 August 2003 05:16
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Mr DOHC	Wed, 20 August 2003 00:22
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	earlyrolla	Wed, 20 August 2003 05:59
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	CelicaRA45	Wed, 20 August 2003 07:14
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	xxaccoxx	Wed, 20 August 2003 12:32
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Alchemist	Thu, 21 August 2003 03:37
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Mr DOHC	Thu, 21 August 2003 07:26
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Norbie	Thu, 21 August 2003 08:58
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	blackRA28	Thu, 21 August 2003 13:37
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	benen	Thu, 21 August 2003 14:16
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Norbie	Thu, 21 August 2003 22:56
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	benen	Fri, 22 August 2003 03:15
	Re: high compression VS rev-ability of Hi-Po 18RG	Norbie	Fri, 22 August 2003 03:43

Previous Topic:	strongest gearbox for supercharged 2T
Next Topic:	TA22 Conversion

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.