| Author | Topic |
|---|
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Mon, 25 August 2003 08:30
 
|
 |
| SeptemberSquallIndustries wrote on Sun, 24 August 2003 18:34 |
| Alchemist wrote on Fri, 22 August 2003 15:29 |
Dont use Vortex(95 RON)....tis nasty stuff, BP Ultimate or Shell Optimax(98 RON) are the way to go in your PULP.
|
Care to support that with evidence?
Anecdotal evidence only, but I think my warmed over E15ET Nissan Pulsar EXA loved Vortex premium.
|
http://www.caltex.com.au/products_oil_detail.asp?i d=15
Vortex Gold offers you the latest in fuel technology:
· Designed for use in all petrol-fuelled spark-ignition engines in mobile, portable and stationary applications, Vortex is a high performance, deposit control unleaded petrol.
· It contains technologically-advanced additives to remove and prevent build-up of performance-robbing deposits in your car’s intake valves and fuel systems.
· By keeping your intake system clean, Votex helps engines operate efficiently.
· Caltex Vortex can provide one-tank cleanup of port fuel injectors.
· With an octane rating of no lower than 95, and in some markets 96, will satisfy the Octane needs of most cars in Australia.
damn. doesnt satisfy my octane needs. caltex never listens to my needs. i want a divorce. and im keeping the car 
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
RIP = LRP ?
|
boudan | Wed, 20 August 2003 13:51 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Thu, 21 August 2003 00:45 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
ra23celicachick | Thu, 21 August 2003 02:19 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
draven | Thu, 21 August 2003 06:17 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Astro | Thu, 21 August 2003 06:23 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
draven | Thu, 21 August 2003 06:28 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Stefan | Sun, 24 August 2003 06:37 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
gtman | Thu, 21 August 2003 07:29 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
manipulate | Thu, 21 August 2003 08:53 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
EVOSTi | Thu, 21 August 2003 11:52 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Thu, 21 August 2003 13:29 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Thu, 21 August 2003 13:51 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Thu, 21 August 2003 14:09 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
speakafreaka | Thu, 21 August 2003 14:16 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Clown | Thu, 21 August 2003 14:39 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
ra23celicachick | Thu, 21 August 2003 22:24 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Soarer | Fri, 22 August 2003 00:36 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
rob-ae86 | Fri, 22 August 2003 02:17 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Cyber-punk | Wed, 27 August 2003 02:21 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Wed, 27 August 2003 03:40 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Wed, 27 August 2003 05:16 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Thu, 21 August 2003 23:07 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Fri, 22 August 2003 03:59 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Soarer | Fri, 22 August 2003 04:15 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Simon-AE86 | Fri, 22 August 2003 04:24 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Alchemist | Fri, 22 August 2003 05:29 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Sun, 24 August 2003 08:34 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
speakafreaka | Mon, 25 August 2003 08:30 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
speakafreaka | Fri, 22 August 2003 08:44 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
purpleminiep | Sun, 24 August 2003 07:28 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Stefan | Sun, 24 August 2003 07:34 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Volatile | Sun, 24 August 2003 09:03 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
purpleminiep | Sun, 24 August 2003 14:59 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
gtman | Wed, 27 August 2003 03:37 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Wed, 27 August 2003 07:51 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ? ..
|
RA40Celica | Thu, 28 August 2003 04:50 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
gtman | Thu, 28 August 2003 06:01 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Wed, 10 September 2003 12:17 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
draven | Wed, 10 September 2003 12:32 |
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Wed, 10 September 2003 12:36 |
