Author | Topic |

Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Wed, 27 August 2003 07:51

|
 |
Find another mechanic. As has already been explained, any Japanese car built since the early 70's is designed for unleaded fuel (ie hardened valve seats), so leaded fuel or LRP is not required.
It amazes me how many mechanics don't know shit about cars!
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
RIP = LRP ?
|
boudan | Wed, 20 August 2003 13:51 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Thu, 21 August 2003 00:45 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
ra23celicachick | Thu, 21 August 2003 02:19 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
draven | Thu, 21 August 2003 06:17 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Astro | Thu, 21 August 2003 06:23 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
draven | Thu, 21 August 2003 06:28 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Stefan | Sun, 24 August 2003 06:37 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
gtman | Thu, 21 August 2003 07:29 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
manipulate | Thu, 21 August 2003 08:53 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
EVOSTi | Thu, 21 August 2003 11:52 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Thu, 21 August 2003 13:29 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Thu, 21 August 2003 13:51 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Thu, 21 August 2003 14:09 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
speakafreaka | Thu, 21 August 2003 14:16 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Clown | Thu, 21 August 2003 14:39 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
ra23celicachick | Thu, 21 August 2003 22:24 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Soarer | Fri, 22 August 2003 00:36 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
rob-ae86 | Fri, 22 August 2003 02:17 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Cyber-punk | Wed, 27 August 2003 02:21 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Wed, 27 August 2003 03:40 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Wed, 27 August 2003 05:16 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Thu, 21 August 2003 23:07 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Fri, 22 August 2003 03:59 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Soarer | Fri, 22 August 2003 04:15 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Simon-AE86 | Fri, 22 August 2003 04:24 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Alchemist | Fri, 22 August 2003 05:29 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Sun, 24 August 2003 08:34 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
speakafreaka | Mon, 25 August 2003 08:30 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
speakafreaka | Fri, 22 August 2003 08:44 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
purpleminiep | Sun, 24 August 2003 07:28 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Stefan | Sun, 24 August 2003 07:34 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Volatile | Sun, 24 August 2003 09:03 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
purpleminiep | Sun, 24 August 2003 14:59 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
gtman | Wed, 27 August 2003 03:37 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Norbie | Wed, 27 August 2003 07:51 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ? ..
|
RA40Celica | Thu, 28 August 2003 04:50 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
gtman | Thu, 28 August 2003 06:01 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Wed, 10 September 2003 12:17 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
draven | Wed, 10 September 2003 12:32 |
 |
Re: RIP = LRP ?
|
Callifo | Wed, 10 September 2003 12:36 |