Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
Thu, 28 August 2003 05:50
|
|
1984 Supra's aren't fast in standard form, and in a straight-line race your Celica would probably walk all over it. The Celica probably has the edge in handling as well. They're fairly different cars though, so doing a direct comparison is kinda pointless. The Supra is a big cruisy sports tourer, while the Celica is more of a nimble hot-hatch. I'd take the Supra any day, but others prefer the Celica - it depends what you like!
Don't sell your car just because other people say it's crap. It's YOUR car, so if YOU like it, keep it! If other people don't like it, they can get stuffed.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
charliechalk | Thu, 28 August 2003 05:41 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
Norbie | Thu, 28 August 2003 05:50 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
rob_RA40 | Thu, 28 August 2003 06:01 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
gtman | Thu, 28 August 2003 06:27 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
RobST162 | Thu, 28 August 2003 07:05 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
Classique71 | Thu, 28 August 2003 09:14 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
Apollo | Thu, 28 August 2003 07:04 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
draven | Thu, 28 August 2003 09:39 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
charliechalk | Sat, 30 August 2003 14:39 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
Classique71 | Sun, 31 August 2003 02:18 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
SCO-77K | Sun, 31 August 2003 03:33 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
charliechalk | Sun, 31 August 2003 09:50 |
|
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)
|
Evil_Foetus | Sat, 06 September 2003 16:08 |