Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au
F.A.Q. F.A.Q.    Register Register    Login Login    Home Home
Members Members    Search Search
Toymods » General Car Talk » Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)

Show: Today's Posts  :: Show Polls 
Email to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
AuthorTopic
Classique71
Forums Junkie


Location:
Colac, Victoria
Registered:
May 2002
Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) Thu, 28 August 2003 09:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ha ! well i can pretty much vouch for every camp here

I have a celica Gt4 ( i know its a turbo - but ive also driven numerous 162's ), a Supra ma61 next to it and my last car was a 1977 6.2 litle 351 fairylane

Ok - all in all - the Gt4 spanks the lot - no competition from ANY of the other two

The fairlane was a pure torque monster ( 400 odd Nm of torquiness is fun ) - they weigh an F-ing tonnee or three , have shit brakes , handle like the titanic - but are SO DAMN comfy to cruise in . Its built purely for old men to roll around in and relax - its by no means a sportscar - and never will be.

The supra ( in stock form with auto ) handles pretty good - but the engine leaves ALOT to be desired in its stock setup - it seems way too " wheesy " and this is compunded mores by the auto - BUT get it above say 60KM - and the handling is very good - the brakes are up therw rith the best , the auto actually becomes useful in " maual down/upshifting " and its pretty sporty - BUT it is a GT car - its big + long - with comfy goodness inside .. Im pretty sure with stiffened suspension , and a engine package like norbie now has most of the " faults " ive pointed would dissaprar briskly BUT id still say a Gt4 would outhandle and out brake it, but wouldnt have the top end grunt or torque .

The Gt4 - in relative stock form is so precise - reasonably well balanced and really comes into its element when corners are thrown at it - you point turn and lay in the right foot and it just GOES - and stays ! it could probably do with a better power band - ( im guessing alot of this comes down to the restrictiveness of the exhaust flow - to be tested soon ) Seats wise - its probably not up to par with either the fairlane ( luxurious armchair ) or supra ( huggy grippy goodness ) but thats the only real minus i see against all three that i have owned and driven side by side ..

Keep your celica - make it breathe - and have alot of fun! - no point changing what alot of us know is a great package in your st162 !

  Send a private message to this user    

SubjectPosterDate
Read Message   Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) charliechalkThu, 28 August 2003 05:41
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) NorbieThu, 28 August 2003 05:50
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) rob_RA40Thu, 28 August 2003 06:01
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) gtmanThu, 28 August 2003 06:27
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) RobST162Thu, 28 August 2003 07:05
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984)  Classique71Thu, 28 August 2003 09:14
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) ApolloThu, 28 August 2003 07:04
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) dravenThu, 28 August 2003 09:39
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) charliechalkSat, 30 August 2003 14:39
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) Classique71Sun, 31 August 2003 02:18
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) SCO-77KSun, 31 August 2003 03:33
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) charliechalkSun, 31 August 2003 09:50
Read Message   Re: Celica (st162) vs Supra (1984) Evil_FoetusSat, 06 September 2003 16:08
Previous Topic:leaded or unleaded
Next Topic:the kicked the crap out of my soarer!

Goto Forum:
-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Sat Nov 30 16:20:10 UTC 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0065629482269287 seconds

Bandwidth utilization bar

.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.3.8
Copyright ©2001-2003 Advanced Internet Designs Inc.