Author | Topic |

Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Wed, 03 September 2003 08:10

|
 |
ed_ma61 wrote on Wed, 03 September 2003 14:29 | Heres a question, if an engine series was produced from say 1980 till 1990, and you have a 1985 car - can you put the 1980 engine in, and simply claim that the engine series didnt change, and thus it 'could' be a 1990 engine??
|
Nah, I don't think you'd get away with that line of reasoning. The emissions requirements in 1985 were different to 1980, so your 1980 automatically doesn't comply. Of course if you wanted to do the full emissions test then you can do anything you like (provided it passes of course), but apparently that's horrendously expensive. 
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 01 September 2003 06:08 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 01 September 2003 08:41 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Allan | Mon, 01 September 2003 09:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Mon, 01 September 2003 10:16 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 01 September 2003 13:32 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 01 September 2003 14:01 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 01 September 2003 22:19 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Mon, 01 September 2003 23:02 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
TheStitt | Mon, 01 September 2003 23:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Cyber-punk | Tue, 02 September 2003 00:55 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Drift pig | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
BlackSupra | Tue, 02 September 2003 04:07 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 02 September 2003 04:06 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 05:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 05:50 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 06:01 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 06:51 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
rob_RA40 | Tue, 02 September 2003 07:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Tue, 02 September 2003 09:03 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 09:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
BigWorm | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:23 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:09 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:21 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
draven | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:28 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Tue, 02 September 2003 11:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 23:21 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:23 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:20 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Wed, 03 September 2003 05:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:33 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:36 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:33 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:44 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:47 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:53 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:55 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:59 |
 |
Uber V12
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:09 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:38 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
coronamark2 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:48 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:57 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 03:59 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
wastegate | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:22 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:29 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:10 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:18 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 07:34 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
hydro | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:12 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:37 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:29 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:06 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:13 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
moo4AGZETA22 | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Alchemist | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:36 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:58 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:44 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Thu, 04 September 2003 01:37 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
thechuckster | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:57 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 04:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 13:58 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 04 September 2003 00:16 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:45 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:59 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 08:07 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Thu, 04 September 2003 08:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:04 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
draven | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:28 |