Author | Topic |

Location: Lost in the K hole
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Wed, 03 September 2003 08:18

|
 |
Norbie wrote on Wed, 03 September 2003 18:10 | Nah, I don't think you'd get away with that line of reasoning. The emissions requirements in 1985 were different to 1980, so your 1980 automatically doesn't comply. Of course if you wanted to do the full emissions test then you can do anything you like (provided it passes of course), but apparently that's horrendously expensive. 
|
hmmm, emission test would be BAD ... 
you seen how many MPG the v12 jag gets *shudders*
i seriously seriously doubt this engine will ever make it in a street car... i think see a tube frame open wheeler chasis in the far distant distant future... 
speaking of which, what are the registration rules for home made kit cars and the like. obvioulsy full engineering, but are they also restricted by engine choice and emission, or are they 'unique' and exempt from emissions??
cheers
ed
[Updated on: Wed, 03 September 2003 08:19]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 01 September 2003 06:08 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 01 September 2003 08:41 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Allan | Mon, 01 September 2003 09:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Mon, 01 September 2003 10:16 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 01 September 2003 13:32 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 01 September 2003 14:01 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 01 September 2003 22:19 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Mon, 01 September 2003 23:02 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
TheStitt | Mon, 01 September 2003 23:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Cyber-punk | Tue, 02 September 2003 00:55 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Drift pig | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
BlackSupra | Tue, 02 September 2003 04:07 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 02 September 2003 04:06 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 05:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 05:50 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 06:01 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 06:51 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
rob_RA40 | Tue, 02 September 2003 07:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Tue, 02 September 2003 09:03 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 09:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
BigWorm | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:23 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:09 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:21 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
draven | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:28 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Tue, 02 September 2003 11:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 23:21 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:23 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:20 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Wed, 03 September 2003 05:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:33 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:36 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:33 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:44 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:47 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:53 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:55 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:59 |
 |
Uber V12
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:09 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:38 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
coronamark2 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:48 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:57 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 03:59 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
wastegate | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:22 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:29 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:10 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:18 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 07:34 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
hydro | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:12 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:37 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:29 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:06 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:13 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
moo4AGZETA22 | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Alchemist | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:36 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:58 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:44 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Thu, 04 September 2003 01:37 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
thechuckster | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:57 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 04:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 13:58 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 04 September 2003 00:16 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:45 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:59 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 08:07 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Thu, 04 September 2003 08:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:04 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
draven | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:28 |