Author | Topic |

I supported Toymods
Location: Perth
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Wed, 03 September 2003 11:27

|
 |
ed_ma61 wrote on Wed, 03 September 2003 16:12 | was talking to a bloke involved with race engine and chasis development, and he described some concerns about the balance of the crank. id also like to find out more about rod/stroke ratios, not just bore stroke.
yes, it is slightly over-square, but its still wasnt ever designed for anything other than application in the century, which requires smooth, quite, low rpm torque. i dont know about getting it to rev. i might work??
|
The thing I have issues with is, since when has he had any experience working on a Toyota V12 that wasn't released out of Japan and has only been around for a few years!?
As for the smoothness and torque, that was the goal for the 1UZFE also, its factory cutout is 6500rpm, when we all know the internals of the engine are capable of FAR more than that.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 01 September 2003 06:08 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 01 September 2003 08:41 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Allan | Mon, 01 September 2003 09:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Mon, 01 September 2003 10:16 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 01 September 2003 13:32 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 01 September 2003 14:01 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 01 September 2003 22:19 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Mon, 01 September 2003 23:02 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
TheStitt | Mon, 01 September 2003 23:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Cyber-punk | Tue, 02 September 2003 00:55 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Drift pig | Tue, 02 September 2003 03:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
BlackSupra | Tue, 02 September 2003 04:07 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
THE WITZL | Tue, 02 September 2003 04:06 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 05:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 05:50 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 06:01 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 06:51 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
rob_RA40 | Tue, 02 September 2003 07:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Tue, 02 September 2003 09:03 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 09:56 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
BigWorm | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:23 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:09 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:21 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
draven | Tue, 02 September 2003 10:28 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Tue, 02 September 2003 11:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
SupraPete | Tue, 02 September 2003 23:21 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:23 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:20 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Wed, 03 September 2003 05:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:33 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:36 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 00:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:33 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:44 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:47 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:53 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:55 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 01:59 |
 |
Uber V12
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:09 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:17 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:38 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
coronamark2 | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:48 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 02:57 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 03:59 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
wastegate | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:22 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 04:29 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:10 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:18 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 07:34 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
hydro | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:12 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:37 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Norbie | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:29 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:40 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:06 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:13 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
moo4AGZETA22 | Wed, 03 September 2003 09:26 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
Alchemist | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:36 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 08:58 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:44 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
biased99 | Thu, 04 September 2003 01:37 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
thechuckster | Wed, 03 September 2003 11:57 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 04:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 03 September 2003 13:58 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
THE WITZL | Thu, 04 September 2003 00:16 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:25 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:45 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Thu, 04 September 2003 07:59 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 08:07 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
chrisss | Thu, 04 September 2003 08:11 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:00 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:04 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:27 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
gianttomato | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:35 |
 |
Re: size limits in the MA70 engine bay... (pete?)
|
draven | Thu, 04 September 2003 09:28 |