| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Brisbane
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Tue, 16 September 2003 01:22
 
|
 |
The SA63 looks nearly the same as the RA65, but it has a 2S-C engine (2.0 litre carby) instead of a 22R-E (2.4 litre EFI). It also has a T series diff (IRS) while the RA65 has an F series.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Opinions on RA65's
|
Ollygt | Sun, 14 September 2003 03:23 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Evil_Foetus | Sun, 14 September 2003 03:27 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Norbie | Sun, 14 September 2003 03:55 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Classique71 | Sun, 14 September 2003 10:18 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Les | Sun, 14 September 2003 10:35 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Norbie | Sun, 14 September 2003 12:23 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Les | Sun, 14 September 2003 12:47 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
maxdamage75 | Mon, 15 September 2003 13:27 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Norbie | Tue, 16 September 2003 00:03 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Les | Tue, 16 September 2003 01:13 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Norbie | Tue, 16 September 2003 01:22 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Les | Tue, 16 September 2003 02:23 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
maxdamage75 | Tue, 16 September 2003 11:03 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
Norbie | Tue, 16 September 2003 12:59 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
maxdamage75 | Tue, 16 September 2003 13:01 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
maxdamage75 | Tue, 16 September 2003 13:13 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
quick | Wed, 17 September 2003 10:53 |
|
Re: Opinions on RA65's
|
CrAiGzEE | Thu, 18 September 2003 11:56 |
