Author | Topic |

I supported Toymods
Location: Perth
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
Wed, 17 September 2003 14:15

|
 |
POR15 cures by absorbing moisture, not by solvents, so its totally non-porous. It doesn't react with any solvents, although paint stripper will remove it (as I found out yesterday ).
It is roughly $66 when bought by the litre. I've used quite a few of their other products, and I've found it really good. Their Marine Clean is awesome at removing grease etc.
The Australian supplier is PPC (Permanent Painted Coatings), they are really helpful, answered a few of my tech questions etc. Their site is: http://www.ppc.au.com/
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Wed, 17 September 2003 13:48 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 17 September 2003 13:51 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 17 September 2003 14:09 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 17 September 2003 14:15 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Wed, 17 September 2003 14:49 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 17 September 2003 14:51 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
alwaysRA23 | Wed, 17 September 2003 16:25 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 03:52 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
roger | Thu, 18 September 2003 04:00 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 17 September 2003 14:18 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
rob_RA40 | Thu, 18 September 2003 03:56 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 03:58 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
purpleminiep | Thu, 18 September 2003 03:59 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
rob_RA40 | Thu, 18 September 2003 04:00 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
roger | Thu, 18 September 2003 04:18 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
Jayem | Thu, 18 September 2003 08:43 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
STR8 2.8 | Thu, 18 September 2003 08:45 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 18 September 2003 08:46 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 09:08 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
Helmann | Thu, 18 September 2003 10:46 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 12:41 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Thu, 18 September 2003 13:18 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Thu, 18 September 2003 11:47 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 13:21 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Thu, 18 September 2003 13:31 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 13:33 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 15:58 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
Jayem | Thu, 18 September 2003 19:41 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Thu, 18 September 2003 23:32 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
Corvid | Fri, 19 September 2003 03:36 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Fri, 19 September 2003 04:22 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
roger | Fri, 19 September 2003 04:58 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Fri, 19 September 2003 06:13 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
roger | Fri, 19 September 2003 06:29 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Fri, 19 September 2003 07:06 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Fri, 19 September 2003 09:37 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
isaac | Thu, 18 September 2003 21:51 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
demuire | Thu, 18 September 2003 22:30 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
BootySlap | Fri, 19 September 2003 08:01 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
TA22 GT | Fri, 19 September 2003 12:00 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
demuire | Fri, 19 September 2003 21:00 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Sat, 20 September 2003 01:13 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
demuire | Sat, 20 September 2003 04:46 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
thechuckster | Sat, 20 September 2003 05:01 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Sat, 20 September 2003 06:01 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Sun, 21 September 2003 13:45 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
draven | Sun, 21 September 2003 13:58 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
raistlin | Sun, 21 September 2003 14:50 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
justcallmefrank | Sun, 21 September 2003 15:06 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
ChuckLandwehr | Mon, 22 September 2003 09:42 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
demuire | Mon, 22 September 2003 10:27 |
 |
Re: acrylic vs 2-pac
|
ChuckLandwehr | Mon, 22 September 2003 11:11 |