Author | Topic |

Location: Sydney
Registered: July 2002
|
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Sun, 21 September 2003 23:46

|
 |
RollaLevin wrote on Wed, 25 September 2002 06:59 | From what I've read, the only useful parts on the 2uz are the heads as they flow marginally better than the 1uz items.
|
The 1uz heads are better than the 2uz, thats why all the drag ones (the HKS and the Turbonetics Celica ) use 2uz bottom ends with 1uz heads and some huge turbos.
More info on Turbonetics Celica do a google search for "drag celica turbonetics"
http://www.turbomagazine.com/features/0210tur_cove rcar/
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
2UZ potential??
|
Henn | Tue, 24 September 2002 08:58 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
draven | Tue, 24 September 2002 09:35 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
rob_RA40 | Tue, 24 September 2002 09:48 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 24 September 2002 11:46 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Manny | Tue, 24 September 2002 11:51 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Henn | Tue, 24 September 2002 15:53 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
RollaLevin | Tue, 24 September 2002 20:59 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
SupraPete | Sun, 21 September 2003 23:46 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 24 September 2002 23:31 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
gianttomato | Wed, 25 September 2002 00:49 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 25 September 2002 03:26 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Tundra | Fri, 19 September 2003 23:27 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
stevevp | Sat, 20 September 2003 00:54 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Tundra | Sat, 20 September 2003 01:03 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
inertia | Sat, 20 September 2003 09:21 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Tundra | Sat, 20 September 2003 13:01 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
SupraPete | Sun, 21 September 2003 23:50 |
 |
Re: 2UZ potential??
|
Tundra | Mon, 22 September 2003 03:05 |