| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Sydney
Registered:
March 2003
|
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Sun, 26 October 2003 05:09
 
|
 |
If it was originally behind the N/A 2j, I'd say the pressure plate would have less clamping force compared to it's turbo counterpart - I'm only making an assumption on this, and assumptions aren't a good thing 
I just measured the drive plate thickness - 9.168mm
Unsure of the total kms on this clutch, probably 35,000kms give or take a few thousand.....
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
V160 Clutch
|
deesonet | Sun, 19 October 2003 09:47 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Soarer | Sun, 19 October 2003 12:02 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Stenno | Mon, 20 October 2003 00:19 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
deesonet | Mon, 20 October 2003 08:33 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Stenno | Mon, 20 October 2003 09:27 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
deesonet | Tue, 21 October 2003 09:33 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
deesonet | Sat, 25 October 2003 09:33 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Stenno | Sun, 26 October 2003 05:09 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Cyber-punk | Mon, 27 October 2003 03:59 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Norbie | Mon, 27 October 2003 07:13 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
humble | Mon, 27 October 2003 11:30 |
|
Re: V160 Clutch
|
Norbie | Mon, 27 October 2003 12:59 |
