Author | Topic |
Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
Mon, 29 July 2002 01:46

|
 |
the main difference is that the dizzy has long leads, and a gap for which the spark, or eletrical charge has to cross. The direct fire type just has a sensor which gives a signal to the ecu to fire an igniter, which then triggers the coils to fire the spark plug. The coil is directly linked to the spark plug either by a short lead, or is directly over the spark plug, ie direct fire coils. The energy required to jump a spark across two gaps, like the dizzy type ingnition is greater, and if you use a dizzy, then you only have one coil, and one iginter usually, so this has more load on it, so to be able to precisely fire the spark plug, as to avoid detonation, etc.... is harder to control. Another question.......... What is a Zorst Manifold?? is it a custom one??
Cheers Nilezy
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Mon, 22 July 2002 16:28 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
DAMO | Mon, 22 July 2002 20:09 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Tue, 23 July 2002 04:12 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
Rattlehead | Tue, 23 July 2002 14:11 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Tue, 23 July 2002 14:22 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
Rattlehead | Tue, 23 July 2002 19:21 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Wed, 24 July 2002 01:32 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
nilezy | Sun, 28 July 2002 02:37 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Sun, 28 July 2002 05:28 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
nilezy | Sun, 28 July 2002 09:09 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Sun, 28 July 2002 15:23 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
nilezy | Mon, 29 July 2002 01:46 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
RobR | Mon, 29 July 2002 10:29 |
 |
Re: 1GGTE engine for reco
|
tuff_ra28 | Sat, 03 August 2002 07:18 |