Author | Topic |
Location: Canberra
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Sat, 22 November 2003 05:40
|
|
"pushy" means pushbike, bicycle, whatever I dont think philmelvin really believes he can pass you on his bike
How the hell are you guys getting that much out of the little 4AG? What sort of dyno do you use? Dynojet? Dyno Dynamics??
You must have a hell of a lot of fun steering that beast down the 1/4. Surely it cant weigh more than 1000kg with a driver.
How late in the revs does it make full boost with the GT30? I was worried about going for an internal gate GT25R!
Cheers
Phil
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 00:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Sat, 22 November 2003 02:50 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:43 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
rob_RA40 | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:48 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:52 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
TE72_Turbo | Sat, 22 November 2003 05:40 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Sat, 22 November 2003 06:28 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
BigWorm | Sat, 22 November 2003 12:02 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Sprinter-Saurus | Sat, 22 November 2003 13:17 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 22 November 2003 17:05 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Grega | Sat, 22 November 2003 20:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sun, 23 November 2003 01:43 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
draven | Sun, 23 November 2003 01:57 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
STR8 2.8 | Sun, 23 November 2003 02:04 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sun, 23 November 2003 02:11 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 23 November 2003 07:31 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
THE WITZL | Sun, 23 November 2003 09:23 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 24 November 2003 03:54 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Mon, 24 November 2003 07:32 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Mon, 24 November 2003 12:13 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Mon, 24 November 2003 21:53 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 24 November 2003 23:47 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 24 November 2003 23:46 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
no_tofu_speed | Wed, 26 November 2003 15:15 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Wed, 26 November 2003 22:29 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Thu, 27 November 2003 04:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
no_tofu_speed | Thu, 27 November 2003 12:32 |