Author | Topic |
Toymods Board Member I supported Toymods
Location: Turramurra, Sydney.
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Sat, 22 November 2003 12:02
|
|
G'day Gina, congratulations on your achievement, 350 odd RWKW from a 1600cc is phenomenal, and is it true that you are doing it with the standard 8:1 4A-GZE pistons & standard treated rods?
There's quite a few of us on here that have done or are doing custom 4A-GTEs, myself being one, so your zoom feature did cause a bit of interest.
I can't believe you've pulled another 80hp out of the thing!
BTW, you might be interested in a few threads in the tech & conversion section, where one of our forum members (Stuart/oldcorollas) has sliced up an 8:1 GZE piston & magnified & has come up with some interesting findings on them. You obviously don't need any persuasion of there strength, but it's interesting none the less.
Here's the links:
http://forums.toymods.org.au/index.php?t=msg&g oto=184686&rid=37&S=8eb4448259b76c34553918 4f99557c33
http://forums.toymods.org.au/index.php?t=msg&g oto=198924&rid=37&S=8eb4448259b76c34553918 4f99557c33
http://forums.toymods.org.au/index.php?t=msg&t h=23757&start=0&rid=37&S=8eb4448259b76 c345539184f99557c33
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 00:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Sat, 22 November 2003 02:50 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:43 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
rob_RA40 | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:48 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:52 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
TE72_Turbo | Sat, 22 November 2003 05:40 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Sat, 22 November 2003 06:28 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
BigWorm | Sat, 22 November 2003 12:02 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Sprinter-Saurus | Sat, 22 November 2003 13:17 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 22 November 2003 17:05 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Grega | Sat, 22 November 2003 20:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sun, 23 November 2003 01:43 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
draven | Sun, 23 November 2003 01:57 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
STR8 2.8 | Sun, 23 November 2003 02:04 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sun, 23 November 2003 02:11 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 23 November 2003 07:31 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
THE WITZL | Sun, 23 November 2003 09:23 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 24 November 2003 03:54 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Mon, 24 November 2003 07:32 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Mon, 24 November 2003 12:13 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Mon, 24 November 2003 21:53 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 24 November 2003 23:47 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 24 November 2003 23:46 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
no_tofu_speed | Wed, 26 November 2003 15:15 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Wed, 26 November 2003 22:29 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Thu, 27 November 2003 04:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
no_tofu_speed | Thu, 27 November 2003 12:32 |