Author | Topic |
Location: New Zealand
Registered: November 2003
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Thu, 27 November 2003 04:26
|
|
I don’t know your thinking of the right evo.
Our evo is the Blue Evo3 "DOCILE", featured on the cover of Zoom a couple of months back. Andre has run a best 1/4 of 9.59. We were making about 700hp atw. It has just come back out, after another set of extensive mods, but we haven't quite got it finish yet. Hopefully have it running by the end of the year.
Gonna be running on methanol, larger turbo, extensively lightened etc etc.
Cars were cheap to buy here, until the Govt changed the laws for importing pre-96 cars (not up to frontal impact stds), but in comparison I suppose they still are relatively cheap.
Our import drag scene is growing quickly, and the cars are getting fast. I don’t think the V8 guys know what to do!!
We are looking into bringing the Evo over for the Jamboree next year, might have to sneak the corolla into the container for a bit of fun too!!
I'm just waiting for my web site guy to load the pics to our site, I'll let ya know when they're up!!
Gina
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 00:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Sat, 22 November 2003 02:50 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:43 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
rob_RA40 | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:48 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sat, 22 November 2003 03:52 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
TE72_Turbo | Sat, 22 November 2003 05:40 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Sat, 22 November 2003 06:28 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
BigWorm | Sat, 22 November 2003 12:02 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Sprinter-Saurus | Sat, 22 November 2003 13:17 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Bill Sherwood | Sat, 22 November 2003 17:05 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Grega | Sat, 22 November 2003 20:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sun, 23 November 2003 01:43 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
draven | Sun, 23 November 2003 01:57 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
STR8 2.8 | Sun, 23 November 2003 02:04 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Sun, 23 November 2003 02:11 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
V8_MA61 | Sun, 23 November 2003 07:31 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
THE WITZL | Sun, 23 November 2003 09:23 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 24 November 2003 03:54 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Mon, 24 November 2003 07:32 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Mr DOHC | Mon, 24 November 2003 12:13 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Mon, 24 November 2003 21:53 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
bbaacchhyy | Mon, 24 November 2003 23:47 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Mon, 24 November 2003 23:46 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
no_tofu_speed | Wed, 26 November 2003 15:15 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
Jag7799 | Wed, 26 November 2003 22:29 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
T1MID | Thu, 27 November 2003 04:26 |
|
Re: was 294rwkw, but now...
|
no_tofu_speed | Thu, 27 November 2003 12:32 |
Current Time:
Wed Jan 22 03:01:11 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0074961185455322 seconds |