| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
1st street on the right
Registered:
November 2002
|
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Fri, 05 December 2003 12:23
 
|
 |
|
A std 6 x 4 is printed at photo lab at 300 dpi. So your if your pic is at 2400 x 1200 (2.88 megpxl) it's a larger than necessary file size and my sisiters biggest complaint at work. When you enlarge however that's when it makes a difference. Try to use tiff's if possible as there is no loss due to compression as there is with jpegs. had to work out the same deal with mine, high quality and super high are the same res but different compression rates. If you want to really large enlargements then you need to save in raws format and fine a lab with reguar fractal software. If you have a few days look it up and read away. Great new stuff but needs big computers and bigger dollars. But will take any raw image and enlarge without loss to extreme sizes.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Les | Thu, 04 December 2003 06:16 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
jackel | Thu, 04 December 2003 18:29 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 00:27 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Les | Fri, 05 December 2003 01:42 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 01:52 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Les | Fri, 05 December 2003 02:29 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 02:37 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
clubagreenie | Fri, 05 December 2003 12:23 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 12:38 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
clubagreenie | Fri, 05 December 2003 22:59 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Nark | Sun, 07 December 2003 23:55 |
