| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Cabramatta, NSW
Registered:
May 2002
|
 Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Sun, 07 December 2003 23:55
|
 |
Les, take a photo of something at 45 degrees. Make sure there's lots of contrast between the object and the background.
You should be able to see more artefacts in the normal compression one.
FWIW, normal is fine for taking photos. It's only if you're anal about image quality (like me) or you're gonna do some graphics work with the photos that you'll want to use fine.
They correspond to the JPEG quality, ie: 75% or 95%...
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Les | Thu, 04 December 2003 06:16 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
jackel | Thu, 04 December 2003 18:29 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 00:27 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Les | Fri, 05 December 2003 01:42 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 01:52 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Les | Fri, 05 December 2003 02:29 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 02:37 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
clubagreenie | Fri, 05 December 2003 12:23 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
CrUZsida | Fri, 05 December 2003 12:38 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
clubagreenie | Fri, 05 December 2003 22:59 |
|
Re: Fine or standard quality (DSC)?
|
Nark | Sun, 07 December 2003 23:55 |
