Author | Topic |

Location: Brisbane
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
Wed, 10 December 2003 08:41

|
 |
A decent 3" exhaust (including dump pipe, not just a cat-back) and a bleed valve will get your car into the high 13's, which is plenty quick for a street car. The next thing I'd do is get rid of the piss-poor factory intercooler and replace it with something decent. Beyond that, a high-flow CT26 and the aforementioned Lexus AFM upgrade sounds like a good idea, and by then you should be doing 12's. As the current owner of a 12 second car I can tell you you'll be faster than practically everything on the street!
Of course you should re-torque the head on that 7M before you do any of this, if you haven't done so already. I'd also upgrade the headgasket before high-flowing the turbo, just to be safe.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
thug_immortal | Wed, 10 December 2003 07:57 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
Norbie | Wed, 10 December 2003 08:20 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
thug_immortal | Wed, 10 December 2003 08:23 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
Norbie | Wed, 10 December 2003 08:41 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
thug_immortal | Wed, 10 December 2003 09:59 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
Norbie | Wed, 10 December 2003 13:04 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
thug_immortal | Thu, 11 December 2003 03:48 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
Norbie | Thu, 11 December 2003 05:21 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
2Lsupra | Sun, 14 December 2003 16:52 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
sideshow | Sun, 14 December 2003 21:54 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
4DaDrift | Mon, 15 December 2003 01:48 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
Norbie | Mon, 15 December 2003 03:15 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
pimp1j | Mon, 15 December 2003 03:35 |
 |
Re: Unichip, r they a good idea?
|
thug_immortal | Mon, 15 December 2003 06:46 |
Current Time:
Tue Jul 29 04:07:19 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.025893926620483 seconds |