Toymods Car Club Inc: The Outhouse => the lunar conspiracy theory

Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au

F.A.Q.

Home

Members

Toymods » The Outhouse » the lunar conspiracy theory Show: Today's Posts :: Show Polls Email to friend

Author

Topic

gt20v
Regular

Registered:
July 2002

Re: the lunar conspiracy theory

Sat, 13 December 2003 01:36

can't believe this is still going! I just thought I came back to post a link, there's a show coming Tuesday on SBS, from a German report..

draven wrote on Thu, 11 December 2003 13:39

the implosion theory based on fixed explosives was beyond stupid - thanks to the well-videotaped collapse, you can see no additional charges going off. and since the design of the two towers was such that the structural support came from the exterior walls, the charges would have had to be placed very close to the outside of the building, and the explosions would have been noticed.

But talk about stupidity, if anyone really believe the structural support came from the exterior walls just because the media saids so... just because the expert saids so, they are really DUMB, sorry to be so blunt..

(I never believe experts, they're bunch of idiots that keeps bullshitting his/her way through the radio show)

but if the structural support is really just from the side of the building, then AS SOON AS THE PLANE HIT THAT CORNER OF TOWER 2, the building would have straight away tilted to that side and everything above that corner would've collapsed onto it, sorry to tell you, but all the "experts" that you hear from the media aren't expert, the twin tower had huge centre columns and huge beams that supported EVERY FLOOR, and supported the centre columns to the outside walls, otherwise the force of the winds would have pressured the walls together and the building won't be standing at all...

people just don't understand they are not supposed to trust "expert reports" that came out months after the event happened.. they just don't get it! Rolling Eyes

thanks biased99 for finding the picture, obviously if any plane had hit the building, there would be a wide spanning wing shape with most likely, at least black marking with the impression of the bird shape, even if the plane was made of aluminium, there would be markings, even if a F14 had hit it, it would've left the same mark, but people concluded that US is actually smart enough not to waste a plane or a fighter jet, instead it was just a missile that was fired into the Pentagon

people keep getting the impression from the media that the avgas is going to be producing a lot of heat to melt everything, the explosion at collusion would have wasted most of the avgas, to be able to melt the metals from the twin tower, it would've needed more than 1500c consistantly for a really really long time, something that a super lean mixture of avgas won't produce (as if there's any avgas left after the collusion, the thinning of oxygen (atmosphere) at the height of the building, and the confined volume of air inside the building would've have produced the temperture to melt anything)

anyway, whether the september event was done by the real Bin Ladan or the US, the SBS show may be quite interesting

[Report message to a moderator]

[Message index]

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Wed May 14 07:11:06 UTC 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.007519006729126 seconds

.:: Contact :: Home ::.