| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Canberra
Registered:
May 2002
|
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
Wed, 24 December 2003 03:19
 
|
 |
| Quote: |
shit flow hence good flutter... good for your fully sick vl turbo.
|
WTF is that supposed to mean? Explain how it makes a 'sick' flutter? Do you understand what reversion is and what causes it?
And as for trucks not revving, it doesn't mean anything at all, since at 1800rpm they are most likely flowing shitloads more air than any of the 'performance' applications we could build.
Airflow = horsepower. If a truck core can flow enough air for your target power without considerable pressure drop (1-2psi) whilst keeping air temp within say 20 degrees above ambient, then there's no reason to criticise it. There are several truck core applications that match the above criteria, but as said, there are some pretty bad designs too.
Many truck cores end up at the wreckers because of cracked end tanks only, which are almost always replaced for our use to suit the car anyways.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
Truck Intercoolers
|
SupraBOY | Tue, 23 December 2003 11:44 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
boris | Tue, 23 December 2003 12:22 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
shindeokure | Tue, 23 December 2003 13:29 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
MS-75 | Tue, 23 December 2003 22:25 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
ke382TG | Tue, 23 December 2003 22:46 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
Fattony | Tue, 23 December 2003 23:26 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
MS-75 | Tue, 23 December 2003 23:54 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
ke382TG | Wed, 24 December 2003 00:12 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
LowRollaBoy | Wed, 24 December 2003 01:45 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
TE72_Turbo | Wed, 24 December 2003 03:19 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
SupraBOY | Wed, 24 December 2003 07:38 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 24 December 2003 11:02 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
SupraBOY | Wed, 24 December 2003 23:48 |
|
Re: Truck Intercoolers
|
mrshin | Thu, 25 December 2003 03:59 |
