Author | Topic |

I supported Toymods
Location: Central Coast
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mon, 29 December 2003 23:48

|
 |
Classique71 wrote on Mon, 29 December 2003 17:07 | camrys seem to be better performers
|
umm, I dont want to start shyte, but I have also had the privilage? :/ to drive both a V6 3.0ltr Camry (my parents) and a 3.5ltr Magna (some turds). Magna definently wins hands down. The old 3.0ltr Magnas were rubbish, but the 3.5 are quite respectable.
I don't honestly think the Camry's would outperform a commo or falcon, but they at least you cant heard them from 200 metres away !! 
According to drive.com.au the magnas specs are:
Power 155 KW
Torque 316 Nm
Kerb Weight 1468 kg
And Camry:
Power 141 KW
Torque 279 Nm
Kerb Weight 1416 kg
and just to throw a spanner in the works :
89 Celica SX
Power 103 KW
Torque 173 Nm
Kerb Weight 1145 kg
Sorry I am not Toyota biased...
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Wed, 10 December 2003 00:33 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
RobST162 | Wed, 10 December 2003 01:50 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Evil_Foetus | Thu, 11 December 2003 05:49 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Shraka | Thu, 11 December 2003 15:47 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Fri, 12 December 2003 00:52 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Sat, 13 December 2003 11:18 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
RobST162 | Sat, 13 December 2003 12:50 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mr DOHC | Sun, 14 December 2003 04:46 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Mon, 22 December 2003 22:45 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Tue, 23 December 2003 23:35 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mr DOHC | Wed, 24 December 2003 11:33 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
CRAB-86 | Wed, 24 December 2003 14:39 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Sun, 28 December 2003 21:50 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Mon, 29 December 2003 01:34 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
truenosedan | Thu, 01 January 2004 03:33 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
truenosedan | Thu, 25 December 2003 14:41 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Sun, 28 December 2003 05:16 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Draza | Sat, 27 December 2003 11:15 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Sat, 27 December 2003 13:17 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Draza | Sat, 27 December 2003 22:29 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Sun, 28 December 2003 00:09 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Mon, 29 December 2003 05:40 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Mon, 29 December 2003 06:07 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
rvrolla | Mon, 29 December 2003 23:48 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
TRD-ST162 | Mon, 29 December 2003 07:36 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Mon, 29 December 2003 22:29 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Tue, 30 December 2003 01:13 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mr DOHC | Tue, 30 December 2003 10:08 |