Author | Topic |

Location: Adelaide
Registered: May 2003
|
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Thu, 01 January 2004 03:33

|
 |
Classique71 wrote on Mon, 29 December 2003 12:04 | i had a magna as a company car a while back - was a SLOW ARSE piece of turd ..
drove like shit too
Boss had a verada v6 - Slow and bad handling also - thou the sports shift was fun ..
Sorry - but only the VRX and ralliart ones are worth a look at the rest couldnt even worry a falcadore
|
man for a stock car magnas a great! good brakes, excellent transmissions, they do have vauge steering and a bit of torque steer but apart from that they are great! my dad had a 2001 magna ( 3.5, auto ) and has just finished his time with a series 1 VY Commode! and he says although the 'dore is more fun in the wet, the magna is a fair bit quicker, easier on the juice, more compliant when it come to kicking down and general fit and finish, oh and the handling anint half bad either, 'slow arse piece of turd i think not', i have read only good reports about them
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Wed, 10 December 2003 00:33 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
RobST162 | Wed, 10 December 2003 01:50 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Evil_Foetus | Thu, 11 December 2003 05:49 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Shraka | Thu, 11 December 2003 15:47 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Fri, 12 December 2003 00:52 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Sat, 13 December 2003 11:18 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
RobST162 | Sat, 13 December 2003 12:50 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mr DOHC | Sun, 14 December 2003 04:46 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Mon, 22 December 2003 22:45 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Tue, 23 December 2003 23:35 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mr DOHC | Wed, 24 December 2003 11:33 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
CRAB-86 | Wed, 24 December 2003 14:39 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Sun, 28 December 2003 21:50 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Mon, 29 December 2003 01:34 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
truenosedan | Thu, 01 January 2004 03:33 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
truenosedan | Thu, 25 December 2003 14:41 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
zecscott | Sun, 28 December 2003 05:16 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Draza | Sat, 27 December 2003 11:15 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Sat, 27 December 2003 13:17 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Draza | Sat, 27 December 2003 22:29 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Sun, 28 December 2003 00:09 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Mon, 29 December 2003 05:40 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Classique71 | Mon, 29 December 2003 06:07 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
rvrolla | Mon, 29 December 2003 23:48 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
TRD-ST162 | Mon, 29 December 2003 07:36 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Mon, 29 December 2003 22:29 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Billy-Mason PI | Tue, 30 December 2003 01:13 |
 |
Re: st162 celica vs late model magna
|
Mr DOHC | Tue, 30 December 2003 10:08 |