Toymods Car Club Inc: The Outhouse => September 11 Conspiracies... :P

Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au

F.A.Q.

Home

Members

Toymods » The Outhouse » September 11 Conspiracies... :P Show: Today's Posts :: Show Polls Email to friend

Author

Topic

gt20v
Regular

Registered:
July 2002

Re: September 11 Conspiracies... :P

Sat, 03 January 2004 07:14

Bill Sherwood wrote on Sat, 03 January 2004 17:04

Good grief, conspiracy people, they're so gullable ....

The second tower falling before the first is very easy to understand - The plane hit it a lot further down than the first, so there is a LOT more weight above the damaged section, so the damaged section would fail first on that second building.
Also, the second plane was travelling a lot faster than the first one, which did a lot more mechanical damage.
The reason the third tower fell is because if you get a building that's a hundred-dd stories tall collapsing in a few seconds, it won't fall into a neat pile it'll spread out and do it pretty quickly. Many thousands of tonnes of hard concrete & metal would have gone sideways (the towers didn't go down exactly vertically) and so it's not surprising at all that a lot of debris hit another building, and thus damaged it to the point that it too fell down.

I must say it's a very good try of imagining what happened, but I really wonder if you know anything about physics at all, no offense here, but that explaination is really a big miss!

yes the plane of the second tower really did travel faster, but it actually missed the centre and hit the corner of the building, with the majority of the jet fuel splashed outside the building, which immediately contradicts the theory presented by the media, because their explaination of the collapse was that the high temp. of the jet fuel had melted the tower's steel support and caused the tower to collapsed.

now your theory suggests that the tower was hit much lower with more speed into the 2nd tower, if your theory is, there is more weight pushing down onto the building, thus creating the collapse EARLIER than the 1st tower, first your theory contradicts the "experts" of the bullshit media, second problem is if this extra weight does make any difference, try building a building with cards or legos, and just take out the corner, tell me where the tower will fall?

But it is state of the art twin tower, if a corner was taken out, the opposite foundation would not even have moved.

and your explaination of the third tower is even more wild, the power of the 2 falling WTC that destroyed the 3rd tower wasn't even enough damage other buildings??? There is no recorded information about any damages to the towers around them, not even shatter windows and/or glass.

again no offense, but I really hope you think hard about what you were saying, and hope you find some sense there..

[Updated on: Sat, 03 January 2004 07:18]

[Report message to a moderator]

[Message index]

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Mon Apr 7 21:43:52 UTC 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.014179944992065 seconds

.:: Contact :: Home ::.