Author | Topic |

Location: Sydney
Registered: June 2003
|
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Mon, 05 January 2004 22:09

|
 |
Yes! Admittedly it's a 5th day wicket but it's still not too bad. And the required run rate is only about .5 runs an over higher than our AVERAGE run rate in tests. So YES! If our batters pull it together most definitely.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Malicia | Mon, 05 January 2004 21:33 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
alwaysRA23 | Mon, 05 January 2004 22:08 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Caledwvech | Mon, 05 January 2004 22:09 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
gianttomato | Mon, 05 January 2004 22:42 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Caledwvech | Mon, 05 January 2004 22:46 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Lambolica | Mon, 05 January 2004 22:58 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Caledwvech | Mon, 05 January 2004 23:07 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
CrUZsida | Tue, 06 January 2004 03:31 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
BlackSupra | Tue, 06 January 2004 03:38 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Caledwvech | Tue, 06 January 2004 03:52 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Lambolica | Tue, 06 January 2004 03:54 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
NickAE86 | Tue, 06 January 2004 03:55 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
BlackSupra | Tue, 06 January 2004 03:58 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
NickAE86 | Tue, 06 January 2004 07:15 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Mr DOHC | Wed, 07 January 2004 08:11 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
CrUZsida | Wed, 07 January 2004 08:14 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
Mr DOHC | Wed, 07 January 2004 09:58 |
 |
Re: Aussie Aussie Aussie
|
rvrolla | Fri, 09 January 2004 06:13 |