Toymods Car Club Inc: The Outhouse => September 11 Conspiracies... :P

Toymods Car Club
www.toymods.org.au

F.A.Q.

Home

Members

Toymods » The Outhouse » September 11 Conspiracies... :P Show: Today's Posts :: Show Polls Email to friend

Author

Topic

Bill Sherwood
Forums Junkie

Location:
Brisbane / Gold Coast
Registered:
May 2002

Re: September 11 Conspiracies... :P	Tue, 13 January 2004 04:37

sign Wasted words on the trolls, but for the edification of the others here - But that's not what we're told, we were told the plane was FULL of fuel because it have just taken off, either the media & government took a "guess" (which we're all against, right?), or they really know there's a lot of fuel in the plane??? OR the government is just trying to make the story sounds bigger! It takes about five & a bit hours to cross the US in a 767/757. They can carry a good ten hours of fuel. So (Pay attention now) they did not have full tanks. We're only required to carry the fuel sufficient to do the flight plus 30 mins & 5%. (This varies with each airline, but such figures are common) That's how I can up with the fuel figure I mentioned previous - It wasn't a random guess. and the missile theory could be possible too, WHAT missle 'theory'? If a 767 was fired upon by any air-to-air missile, they simply cannot turn anything like fast enough to evade anything at all. They can in the movies, but real life is somewhat different. I had a mate that flew IAI Westwinds (like a Learjet) on contract for the Air Force in Aus, as a mobile target for the F-18's to intercept on. He said absolutely <i>everything</i> they tried failed when they tried to get away. There was nothing at all they could do to get the F-18's off their tail, even the movie tricks such as 'hitting the brakes and they'll fly right past us' rubbish. An airliner is maybe 20% as manoeuverable as a Westwind. IF you mean some other nutcase theory as to a missle hitting the Towers, there is the slight problem that no-one anywhere saw a missile. If such a theory exists, there is no way to co-ordinate the impact of the missile with the plane at the surface of the Tower, especially twice in a row. Suffice to say both 'theories' are utter rubbich. because I'm sure you remembered the sharp banking of the huge 757, followed by the disappearance of the 757 into the tower, At 450-500kts a plane (doesn't matter what sort, physics is physics) will only turn at a couple of degrees per second. Not exactly a fast rate of turn considering that at such a rate it takes over two minutes to do a 360deg turn. you would have thought the engines which are mounted on the wings, would explode Why on earth would they 'explode'? They hold very little fuel and have almost no parts that will burn. True enough they have a great deal of kinetic energy stored in them from the rotating sections, but they will not make much of a flaming explosion as such. this theory could also explain the lack of fuel. Which has already been debunked completely. See above for that proof. [Report message to a moderator]

[Message index]

-=] Back to Top [=-

Current Time: Mon Apr 7 21:51:51 UTC 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0095021724700928 seconds

.:: Contact :: Home ::.