Author | Topic |
Registered: December 2003
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Sat, 17 January 2004 10:47
|
|
The reason the twin-charger set up is good is its BIG FAT WIDE FLAT torque curve .. The wider you can get you torque band the More "drivable"the car is ,,This Set up makes over 80%of its Torque at 2500rpm ..Maximum Acceleration is at maximum torque Iam making 200hp @6000rpm at the rear wheels on pump fuel at the moment this enough power for a Car that weighs 770kgs ,Iam not turning the super charger off and By passing the supercharger like the HKS set up so iam loosing Top end horsepower over 6000rpm as the supercharger becomes restrictive in flow and is also drawing HP from the engine .. You need a Turbo which is suitable for a 3ltr motor not a 1.5 ltr and comes alive around 4000 rpm to make this twin charge set up work . You can Not make the same power curve and torque curve with just a Good turbo .. But i feel you could close with a SCREW TYPE SUPERCHARGER as the Roots Type supercharger is inefficient at high RPM so thats why the Turbo take over in the TWIN-CHARGE set up .. I made the system my self and i agree with peoples comments about it being a complex system ..but it was worth the effort ...BUT if you are paying someone to make it,, Forget it as The Research and Development is to expensive to justify.. Just buy a Screw type Blower OPCON or A SPRINTEX , I couldn't afford one other wise i would have went that way ,,
[Updated on: Sat, 17 January 2004 10:51]
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
Twin charged 4agzte?
|
fatmr2 | Fri, 16 January 2004 04:37 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
wagonist | Fri, 16 January 2004 05:09 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Lambolica | Fri, 16 January 2004 05:39 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Lambolica | Fri, 16 January 2004 06:20 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
CLG | Fri, 16 January 2004 06:35 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Rex_Kelway | Fri, 16 January 2004 05:51 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Norbie | Fri, 16 January 2004 05:51 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
fatmr2 | Fri, 16 January 2004 05:52 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
mrshin | Fri, 16 January 2004 08:01 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Cameron_Datto | Fri, 16 January 2004 10:40 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
RWDboy | Sat, 17 January 2004 04:09 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
fatmr2 | Sat, 17 January 2004 06:16 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Cameron_Datto | Sat, 17 January 2004 10:47 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
fatmr2 | Sat, 17 January 2004 12:53 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Bazooka | Sat, 17 January 2004 23:02 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
shindeokure | Sun, 18 January 2004 02:32 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Norbie | Sun, 18 January 2004 03:31 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
feral4mr2 | Sun, 18 January 2004 03:36 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Norbie | Sun, 18 January 2004 03:44 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
feral4mr2 | Sun, 18 January 2004 03:58 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
oldcorollas | Sun, 18 January 2004 05:09 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Norbie | Sun, 18 January 2004 04:57 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
RWDboy | Sun, 18 January 2004 07:55 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
thechuckster | Sun, 18 January 2004 08:23 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
EVOSTi | Sun, 18 January 2004 09:05 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Toobs | Sun, 18 January 2004 09:09 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Malicia | Mon, 19 January 2004 02:21 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
Jason | Mon, 19 January 2004 03:03 |
|
Re: Twin charged 4agzte?
|
thechuckster | Mon, 19 January 2004 03:16 |
Current Time:
Thu Jan 9 03:42:51 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0056869983673096 seconds |