| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
NSW
Registered:
August 2003
|
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
Tue, 20 January 2004 00:25
 
|
 |
I had the same choice, and i went the 3SGTE.
The car was finished but the CT26 turbo shit
it self on the Dyno and damaged my motor so now
im rebuilding the engine.
I've spent so much money on my conversion im
realy hoping it'll be worth it. Not mentioning
the headaches.
The 4AGZE would be so much easier its not funny.
I had to modify everything in my Sprinter: from
engine and gearbox mounts, starter, custom plenum,
fire wall even the heater box had to be cut and plastic
welded cause of the dizzy.
If you can afford the 3SGTE route, mine is costing
$15000 plus not including the car, then i would
suggest finding a professional welder thats done
conversions before and good luck cause you'll
need it.
Otherwise go with the 4AGZE, much, much easier,
less headaches, lighter, way cheaper.
But i couldnt resist the 2L 3SGTE. You have to ask
your self what you realy want.
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
silver_sleeka74 | Mon, 19 January 2004 23:26 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
John K | Tue, 20 January 2004 00:25 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
Lachie | Tue, 20 January 2004 01:47 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
Cool1 | Tue, 20 January 2004 03:43 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
TurboRA28 | Tue, 20 January 2004 03:58 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
Cool1 | Tue, 20 January 2004 06:22 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
FKN16V | Tue, 20 January 2004 04:11 |
|
Re: 4AGZE vs 3SGTE
|
silver_sleeka74 | Wed, 21 January 2004 05:49 |
