| Author | Topic | 
 
  
Location:  Sydney 
Registered: May 2002
 | 
	| 
		
		Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
	 | 
	
		 
		Tue, 13 August 2002 10:46 
		  
	 | 
 
  |  
	
	
	No just weight and wether its forced induction or not. Its stupid cause you could technically put a 700hp 2L V10 F1 engine in a TA22 where a gutless 253 V8 wouldnt be allowed.
  Jamie.
	
	
	
	
	 | 
 
 
 | 
 | 
|   | Subject | Poster | Date | 
  | 
 
  
Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
Alainve | Tue, 13 August 2002 10:00 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
Norbie | Tue, 13 August 2002 10:18 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
MRTA22 | Tue, 13 August 2002 10:36 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
manipulate | Tue, 13 August 2002 10:44 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities???? 
 | 
MRTA22 | Tue, 13 August 2002 10:46 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
mx83toy | Tue, 13 August 2002 12:41 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
Youngy | Tue, 13 August 2002 12:59 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
Jonny2TG | Tue, 13 August 2002 13:03 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
Barney | Wed, 14 August 2002 01:35 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
Jonny2TG | Wed, 14 August 2002 14:42 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
chrisss | Fri, 16 August 2002 08:23 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
MRTA22 | Fri, 16 August 2002 08:50 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
manipulate | Fri, 16 August 2002 09:38 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
draven | Fri, 16 August 2002 09:45 | 
  | 
 
  
Re: Engine Conversions legalities????
 | 
MRTA22 | Fri, 16 August 2002 16:50 |