| Author | Topic |
|---|
Location:
Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan
Registered:
January 2003
|
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Wed, 11 February 2004 10:52
 
|
 |
| draven wrote on Wed, 11 February 2004 21:36 |
yes
but a $325727 4-cyl turbo would get spanked by a $325727 v12 (one would assume)
|
depends on capacity, boost, rpm, and gearing...
indy car turbo motors have more power at less revs than F1 motors.. so they have more torque, but a 1.5L turbo F1 motor had more power again...
using the eqns posted ages ago, you can work out how much torque you can get from both NA and turbo motor... where you put that torque in the rpm range determines how much power..
if you have a limitless budget, it all comes down to the equations as there are practical and physical limits...
if you want to get silly about it, and start comparing top fueler motors, 8L, SC'd, fuel and air on the verge of becoming liquid just before ignition...
seriously, if you had a 1.5L motor doing that, and an 8L motor... well, you do the math 
Cya, Stewart
ps, i would be very interested to see how the two motors compare, when blakes is finished, and norbies has a boost level that would make it equate to a 5L motor, ie 10psi.
first, comparing dyno graphs, and second, how they perform and "feel"
Cya, Stewart
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 09:54 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:17 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:31 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:42 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:47 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:50 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:55 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 12:58 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:00 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:05 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:13 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:15 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:24 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:17 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:21 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:27 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:27 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:28 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:31 |
|
Re: Strength of W58 gearbox
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:33 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:49 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:51 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:56 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:03 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:09 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
7M-Brisbane | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:56 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:01 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
thechuckster | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:11 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:56 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:57 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 13:58 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
7M-Brisbane | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:02 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:05 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:13 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:09 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:12 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:26 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:14 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:20 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:26 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:21 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:34 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:38 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:24 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:29 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:38 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:42 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
thechuckster | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:46 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
7M-Brisbane | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:36 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:43 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:49 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 08:11 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 11 February 2004 03:17 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:39 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:43 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:46 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
thechuckster | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:53 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Tue, 10 February 2004 02:10 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 02:17 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Tue, 10 February 2004 04:19 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Tue, 10 February 2004 11:31 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:44 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:54 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
thechuckster | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:57 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Mon, 09 February 2004 14:58 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
RWDboy | Tue, 10 February 2004 03:25 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 08:13 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Tue, 10 February 2004 05:13 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
biased99 | Tue, 10 February 2004 09:34 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
draven | Tue, 10 February 2004 08:47 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Tue, 10 February 2004 09:05 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 10:07 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
biased99 | Tue, 10 February 2004 11:42 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Tue, 10 February 2004 23:26 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 10:21 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
T APLUS 22 | Tue, 10 February 2004 11:39 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Tue, 10 February 2004 23:31 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 11:47 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
CLG | Tue, 10 February 2004 13:16 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Dabbid | Tue, 10 February 2004 11:57 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:10 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
7M-Brisbane | Tue, 10 February 2004 11:59 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:02 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:12 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:17 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Dabbid | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:27 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:22 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:35 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 21:46 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:32 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:38 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Tue, 10 February 2004 12:49 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Tue, 10 February 2004 13:19 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
RWDboy | Tue, 10 February 2004 13:44 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
rob_RA40 | Tue, 10 February 2004 21:17 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 10 February 2004 23:06 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Jag7799 | Tue, 10 February 2004 23:08 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
rob_RA40 | Wed, 11 February 2004 04:00 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 11 February 2004 04:17 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Chris Davey | Wed, 11 February 2004 06:23 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Wed, 11 February 2004 08:54 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
CLG | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:04 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:04 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:14 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:45 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
shinybluesteel | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:57 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:00 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:27 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:06 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
T APLUS 22 | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:40 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 09:59 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:34 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
draven | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:36 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:52 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
draven | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
shinybluesteel | Wed, 11 February 2004 11:02 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Thu, 12 February 2004 00:25 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 12 February 2004 06:21 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Thu, 12 February 2004 08:41 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 12 February 2004 12:13 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Fri, 13 February 2004 02:33 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Nark | Wed, 11 February 2004 11:43 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 10:58 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Wed, 11 February 2004 12:18 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Jag7799 | Wed, 11 February 2004 12:36 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Dabbid | Wed, 11 February 2004 20:45 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Wed, 11 February 2004 23:40 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ed_ma61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 03:08 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Thu, 12 February 2004 05:03 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Jag7799 | Wed, 11 February 2004 22:50 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 02:55 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Fri, 13 February 2004 02:29 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 09:33 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 12 February 2004 10:05 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 10:29 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 12 February 2004 10:38 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 10:40 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
79rollaboy | Thu, 12 February 2004 10:57 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
draven | Thu, 12 February 2004 11:17 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 11:22 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
justcallmefrank | Thu, 12 February 2004 12:04 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Thu, 12 February 2004 12:16 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 12 February 2004 12:23 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 12 February 2004 13:04 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
thechuckster | Thu, 12 February 2004 13:12 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ta23 | Thu, 12 February 2004 13:38 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Donuts | Thu, 12 February 2004 14:59 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Dabbid | Thu, 12 February 2004 15:08 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Fri, 13 February 2004 02:35 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Chris Davey | Fri, 13 February 2004 02:59 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Donuts | Fri, 13 February 2004 04:28 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Donuts | Fri, 13 February 2004 04:31 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
gianttomato | Fri, 13 February 2004 04:21 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
thechuckster | Thu, 12 February 2004 13:07 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
oldcorollas | Thu, 12 February 2004 15:31 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Thu, 12 February 2004 23:22 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Sat, 14 February 2004 01:46 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Skip | Sun, 15 February 2004 23:50 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Mon, 16 February 2004 00:49 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
ae95 | Mon, 16 February 2004 00:42 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Mon, 16 February 2004 00:51 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
da_snuff | Fri, 13 February 2004 00:50 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
draven | Fri, 13 February 2004 02:36 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Fri, 13 February 2004 02:36 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Chris Davey | Fri, 13 February 2004 03:01 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Norbie | Fri, 13 February 2004 04:14 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
RWDboy | Sat, 14 February 2004 01:26 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Sat, 14 February 2004 06:35 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
Zhyr | Sun, 15 February 2004 12:36 |
|
Re: forced inductin 'vs' NA capacity
|
V8_MA61 | Mon, 16 February 2004 07:47 |
