| Author | Topic |
|---|
I supported Toymods
Location:
Perth, Western Australia
Registered:
December 2002
|
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Thu, 19 February 2004 12:20
 
|
 |
If your car can be legally complied with the new motor and standard brakes, insurance companies should accept that as proof of suitability. If they don't accept the complete setup, ask to see their evidence thats states to the contrary, that the setup is unacceptable for whatever reason they specify - I don't think you'll find any insurance company will go up against an engineer and win - but they will try it?!!!
On the subject of power, brakes and driving a car with both, I too feel the road rules you drive the car under, have not changed, and therefore the force required to stop a car from (for example 60Km/h) will not change, and therefore standard brakes that are legally complied will be fine for STANDARD ROAD DUTIES. Should you feel the need for speed, then and only then should you need to uprate your brakes, which when you think about it, should only be needed for off street duties anyway?!
|
|
|
| | Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|
 |
3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Wed, 18 February 2004 12:11 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
bbaacchhyy | Wed, 18 February 2004 21:49 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Grega | Wed, 18 February 2004 22:26 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Norbie | Wed, 18 February 2004 22:53 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 00:36 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 19 February 2004 00:44 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:00 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:03 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:05 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
CrUZsida | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:11 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:13 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Norbie | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:44 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:45 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Norbie | Thu, 19 February 2004 01:48 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 02:52 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Thu, 19 February 2004 05:00 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Thu, 19 February 2004 09:45 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
CLG | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:20 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:00 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Grega | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:10 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:12 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
boris | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:12 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Grega | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:16 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Grega | Thu, 19 February 2004 12:17 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
torque | Thu, 19 February 2004 15:30 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
CLG | Fri, 20 February 2004 05:47 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Norbie | Sun, 22 February 2004 04:29 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
CLG | Sun, 22 February 2004 04:47 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Norbie | Sun, 22 February 2004 08:44 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Sun, 22 February 2004 09:29 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Fri, 20 February 2004 08:25 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
torque | Fri, 20 February 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Fri, 20 February 2004 11:57 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
torque | Fri, 20 February 2004 15:09 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Fri, 20 February 2004 19:29 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Norbie | Sun, 22 February 2004 10:13 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Sun, 22 February 2004 10:26 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Sun, 22 February 2004 10:54 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
SeptemberSquallIndustries | Sun, 22 February 2004 11:07 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Sun, 22 February 2004 13:16 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
CLG | Sun, 22 February 2004 15:25 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
T APLUS 22 | Sun, 22 February 2004 22:34 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Purple_Beasty | Sun, 22 February 2004 22:17 |
|
Re: 3TGTE in TA22 & Engineering Debate
|
Zerko | Sun, 29 February 2004 00:38 |
