Author | Topic |
Location: Rocky Mountains, Canada
Registered: May 2002
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Mon, 23 February 2004 17:15
|
|
blackRA28...
Im in exactly the same position as you at the moment, so im also reading these opinions with intrest.
Ive also got a black RA28 im in the process of rebuilding, and am trying to work out my engine options.
As nice as a 1G does sound, i would also like to stick with a 4cyl if resonably possible.
So that pretty much leaves the: 18R-G, 3T-GTE, 3S-GE, SR20
18R-G -> is getting a little old.
3T-GTE -> looks ok, but ive heard they cant be pushed too far.
3S-GE -> yummy.
SR20 -> problems listed above with gearbox, etc.
Im really liking the idea of a strong 3S-GE, but then theres the problem of FWD -> RWD conversion.... that is unless you chose at Altezza 3S-GE which is already RWD, but VERY expensive.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Sat, 21 February 2004 02:06 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
boris | Sat, 21 February 2004 03:49 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Mon, 23 February 2004 03:16 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Mon, 23 February 2004 05:23 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Mon, 23 February 2004 11:40 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:55 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
coronamark2 | Fri, 27 February 2004 08:12 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Mon, 23 February 2004 17:15 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 23 February 2004 21:26 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
RA28midge | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:43 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Grega | Mon, 23 February 2004 20:16 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:08 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Tue, 24 February 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Wed, 25 February 2004 05:36 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 25 February 2004 14:22 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
T APLUS 22 | Wed, 25 February 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:42 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:46 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
onejayzed | Thu, 26 February 2004 09:54 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Cyber-punk | Fri, 27 February 2004 07:45 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
sideshow | Fri, 27 February 2004 07:58 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Fri, 27 February 2004 08:08 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Fri, 27 February 2004 12:44 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Sat, 28 February 2004 23:34 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Sun, 29 February 2004 02:56 |
Current Time:
Sat Feb 1 16:47:25 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0044851303100586 seconds |