Author | Topic |

Location: Geelong.Vic.AU
Registered: September 2003
|
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Tue, 24 February 2004 01:26

|
 |
The ST I drove yesterday had a 3s-ge in it, I know that cause it was in big letters down the side of the engine. Does that mean that the engine was not ment to be in that car? and that it was the 103kw engine?
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Mon, 23 February 2004 10:30 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Mon, 23 February 2004 10:53 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Mon, 23 February 2004 12:13 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
alwaysRA23 | Mon, 23 February 2004 12:40 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:05 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Shraka | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:24 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Farmsci ST162 | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:49 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Mon, 23 February 2004 20:54 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
dASh | Tue, 24 February 2004 00:19 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:02 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:15 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Secaism | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:31 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Classique71 | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:48 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:26 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:06 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
alwaysRA23 | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:56 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
RobST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 04:38 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:33 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Tue, 24 February 2004 13:56 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:38 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 21:02 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Wed, 25 February 2004 04:36 |