Author | Topic |
Location: sydney west
Registered: January 2004
|
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Tue, 24 February 2004 01:31

|
 |
smt_007 wrote on Tue, 24 February 2004 12:15 |
justcallmefrank wrote on Tue, 24 February 2004 12:02 |
Oh, and a ST would have a 3SFE.
|
Since the st is a 3sfe, you will be very surprised when you drive a sx celica with a 3sge, a 3sfe revs nicely to 5500rpm and a 3sge revs to 7000rpm .
|
and the seca revs nicely to 7800rpm
seriously take both for a test drive and then decide for yourself, i was considering both cars when i bought my seca sx, and for me the seca was the car for me, cheaper to fix, cheaper insurance, easy to run, more reliable and i loved how rev happy the 4age is
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Mon, 23 February 2004 10:30 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Mon, 23 February 2004 10:53 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Mon, 23 February 2004 12:13 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
alwaysRA23 | Mon, 23 February 2004 12:40 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:05 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Shraka | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:24 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Farmsci ST162 | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:49 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Mon, 23 February 2004 20:54 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
dASh | Tue, 24 February 2004 00:19 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:02 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:15 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Secaism | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:31 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Classique71 | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:48 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:26 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:06 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
alwaysRA23 | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:56 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
RobST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 04:38 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:33 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Tue, 24 February 2004 13:56 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:38 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 21:02 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Wed, 25 February 2004 04:36 |