Author | Topic |
Location: Adelaide and Queenstown T...
Registered: September 2002
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Tue, 24 February 2004 01:43
|
|
with the 3SGE/GTE The FWD to RWD part shouldn't be that big a deal to scare you off, as long as you have access to sump, engine mounts and bellhousing from a ST142 (?) corona with a 2SC/E.
The hardest part might be sourcing a TA23 crossmember.
The W58 is also really easy to fit, just ask steve_m about how easy it was to get through regency, two flat pieces of steel with two holes drilled in each isn't too complicated. That way you could keep the same tail shaft etc until you have cash to upgrade the diff or whatever.
Remember that you can have a 3SGE complied at regency without engineering reports because it is 4cyl, 2l, toyota. as long as it has a factory computer and complies with ADR27a emissions.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Sat, 21 February 2004 02:06 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
boris | Sat, 21 February 2004 03:49 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Mon, 23 February 2004 03:16 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Mon, 23 February 2004 05:23 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Mon, 23 February 2004 11:40 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:55 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
coronamark2 | Fri, 27 February 2004 08:12 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Mon, 23 February 2004 17:15 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 23 February 2004 21:26 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
RA28midge | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:43 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Grega | Mon, 23 February 2004 20:16 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:08 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Tue, 24 February 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Wed, 25 February 2004 05:36 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 25 February 2004 14:22 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
T APLUS 22 | Wed, 25 February 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:42 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:46 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
onejayzed | Thu, 26 February 2004 09:54 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Cyber-punk | Fri, 27 February 2004 07:45 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
sideshow | Fri, 27 February 2004 07:58 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Fri, 27 February 2004 08:08 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Fri, 27 February 2004 12:44 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Sat, 28 February 2004 23:34 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Sun, 29 February 2004 02:56 |
Current Time:
Sat Feb 1 16:49:34 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.0064361095428467 seconds |