Author | Topic |
Location: Melbourne
Registered: October 2003
|
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Wed, 25 February 2004 04:36
|
 |
doobs wrote on Wed, 25 February 2004 08:02 | i'm leaning towards the celica, it just looks so nice and goes very well. I wont buy a celica until i drive a rolla sx, but i think the celica has won me. It has better features and looks much nicer
|
U know the Celica is clearly the winner, No matter what happens it will always be a clear winner,
go for a drive in the corolla sx, But yeah u'll see that the celica has the class of a sports car, u've got a pretty damn good deal for ur money, corolla sx are usually about $1500-$2000 more.....
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
 |
What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Mon, 23 February 2004 10:30 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
drft spec - st167 | Mon, 23 February 2004 10:53 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Mon, 23 February 2004 12:13 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
alwaysRA23 | Mon, 23 February 2004 12:40 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:05 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Shraka | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:24 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Farmsci ST162 | Mon, 23 February 2004 13:49 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Mon, 23 February 2004 20:54 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
dASh | Tue, 24 February 2004 00:19 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
justcallmefrank | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:02 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:15 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Secaism | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:31 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
Classique71 | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:48 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:26 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:06 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
alwaysRA23 | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:56 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
RobST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 04:38 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:33 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
smt_007 | Tue, 24 February 2004 13:56 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Tue, 24 February 2004 12:38 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
doobs | Tue, 24 February 2004 21:02 |
 |
Re: What would be better: 90-92 SECA SX or 87-90 SX Celica
|
TRD-ST162 | Wed, 25 February 2004 04:36 |