Author | Topic |
Location: Adelaide
Registered: September 2003
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Thu, 26 February 2004 02:55
|
|
blackRA28 wrote on Mon, 23 February 2004 22:40 | I am not certain about the emissions side of things, but if i were to get it engineered it wouldnt be a problem.. my mate got a microtech race computer engineered with his 13Bt->series2 conversion and it passed the emissions easy, just tuned a little leaner.. i believe in S.A. our laws are that you have to run a certain amount of stock emissions gear on the motor but the age of the car has a factor in how loud it can be, and how much emissions can be produced regardless of motor..
|
Entirely wrong.
As much as I'd love it to be true for my project, the emissions rules from whatever is the substantially newer part must apply in FULL. i.e. If you put a 1960's motor in a 1990's car, the the emissions regs for the 1990's must be abided, and vice verca.
They system must work in it's entirety.
If you have a dodgy engineer pass a dodgy car, then it is his reputation as well as you car being illegal. Simple.
|
|
|
| Subject | Poster | Date |
|
SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Sat, 21 February 2004 02:06 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
boris | Sat, 21 February 2004 03:49 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Mon, 23 February 2004 03:16 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Mon, 23 February 2004 05:23 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Mon, 23 February 2004 11:40 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
bbaacchhyy | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:55 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
coronamark2 | Fri, 27 February 2004 08:12 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Mon, 23 February 2004 17:15 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
rob_RA40 | Mon, 23 February 2004 21:26 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
RA28midge | Tue, 24 February 2004 01:43 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Grega | Mon, 23 February 2004 20:16 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Tue, 24 February 2004 02:08 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Tue, 24 February 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Wed, 25 February 2004 05:36 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
THE WITZL | Wed, 25 February 2004 14:22 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
T APLUS 22 | Wed, 25 February 2004 14:28 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:42 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
gold28 | Thu, 26 February 2004 02:46 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
onejayzed | Thu, 26 February 2004 09:54 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Cyber-punk | Fri, 27 February 2004 07:45 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
sideshow | Fri, 27 February 2004 07:58 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Fri, 27 February 2004 08:08 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
Norbie | Fri, 27 February 2004 12:44 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
blackRA28 | Sat, 28 February 2004 23:34 |
|
Re: SR20t -> RA28, is it as easy as it looks?
|
M.W.P. | Sun, 29 February 2004 02:56 |
Current Time:
Sat Feb 1 16:48:00 UTC 2025 |
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.007990837097168 seconds |